Calusa Golf, Inc. v. Dade County, 82-1317
| Citation | 426 So.2d 1165 |
| Decision Date | 08 February 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-1317,82-1317 |
| Parties | CALUSA GOLF, INC., Appellant, v. DADE COUNTY, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
John G. Fletcher, South Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty., and Eileen B. Mehta, Asst. County Atty., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.
Appellant Calusa challenges an order of the trial court dismissing its amended complaint seeking relief based on equitable estoppel in connection with a rezoning application.
Calusa's initial complaint filed in October, 1981 sought declaratory relief regarding a restriction placed on a portion of its property by its predecessor in title and recorded in the public records in 1968. The restriction in question limited the use of the described property to a golf course unless released by the Board of County Commissioners with the consent of 75 percent of the members of the corporation owning the property and 75 percent of the property owners within 150 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property. Calusa's previous application for rezoning of part of the land for residential use was denied by the County without a hearing because it failed to submit the requisite consents of the property owners.
In granting judgment on the pleadings for the County, the trial court ruled that the restriction on its face required Calusa to obtain the consent of property owners within 150 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property described in the restriction prior to obtaining a release or revision of the restriction, contrary to Calusa's assertion that it need not submit such consents since it owned all the property within 150 feet of the particular parcel to be rezoned. The court's order also granted Calusa leave to amend its complaint to allege equitable estoppel.
Calusa's amended complaint recited that in 1977, prior to its purchase of the property, the County Commission released a portion of the property from the restriction by rezoning it. Calusa also alleged that the County's position with respect to approval of adjacent property owners, as set forth in an attached letter written in 1977 by an assistant county attorney, was that only the consent of property owners within 150 feet of the property to be released was required, and that the County, having altered the original understanding of the restriction, was estopped to reassert it, Calusa having relied to its detriment on the County's actions. The County moved for dismissal and the court granted the motion, dismissing the amended complaint without prejudice. This appeal followed. We hold that the court properly granted the motion to dismiss and affirm.
Equitable estoppel is to be applied against the state only in rare instances and under exceptional circumstances. State Department of Revenue v. Anderson, 403 So.2d 397 (Fla.1981). To sustain a claim of estoppel against the state or one of its subdivisions, there must be (1) a representation as to some material fact by the party estopped to the party claiming estoppel; (2) reliance upon the representation...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Woodburn v. Fla. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.
...So.2d 155, 163 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Ogden v. State Dep't of Transp., 601 So.2d 1300, 1302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Calusa Golf Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 426 So.2d 1165, 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Greenhut Constr. Co. v. Henry A. Knott, Inc., 247 So.2d 517, 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Such rare and exception......
-
Equity Resources, Inc. v. County of Leon
...475; City of Parkland v. Septimus, 428 So.2d 681 (Fla. 4th DCA), pet. rev. denied, 440 So.2d 353 (Fla.1983); Calusa Golf, Inc. v. Dade County, 426 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).7 This observation is not inconsistent with the hearing officer's finding that in 1972 Pelham did not specifically......
-
Save Calusa, Inc. v. Miami-Dade Cnty.
... Save Calusa, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Miami-Dade County, et al., Respondents. No. 3D22-1296Florida Court of Appeals, Third DistrictFebruary 1, 2023 ... of the site of the now-shuttered Calusa Country Golf Club to ... a golf course, club house, and certain ancillary uses. The ... following ... ...
-
Monroe County v. Hemisphere Equity Realty, Inc., 93-2306
...Furthermore, the act on which the aggrieved party relied must be one on which he had a right to rely. Calusa Golf, Inc. v. Dade County, 426 So.2d 1165, 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (citations omitted). No such rare instance or unusual circumstance exists in this case. Even if the County had been......