Carson v. State, 99-2292.

Decision Date03 December 1999
Docket NumberNo. 99-2292.,99-2292.
Citation747 So.2d 1002
PartiesKenneth CARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Kenneth Carson, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

W. SHARP, J.

Carson appeals the summary denial of his second post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. He is entitled to no relief for two reasons.

First, the issue sought to be raised in this cause—the legality of his sentence—is improper because it is successive. It was raised in his direct appeal and this court affirmed without opinion.1 It was raised again in Carson's June 25, 1998 Motion To Correct Illegal Sentence filed in the trial court. The trial court denied the motion, and Carson's appeal to this court was dismissed. It was raised for a third time in these proceedings when Carson filed his second Motion To Correct Illegal Sentence on April 21, 1999. This issue cannot be raised again! See Medina v. State, 690 So.2d 1241 (Fla.1997)

; Stroble v. State, 689 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Raley v. State, 675 So.2d 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). To do so may subject Carson to sanctions.2

In any event, the sentences Carson received are not illegal. Only the incarcerative portion of a split sentence must be within the guideline range. See Holloway v. State, 668 So.2d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)

. The total sentence, imprisonment plus probation, does not exceed the statutory maximum for first degree felonies as established in section 775.082(3)(b). See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995).

AFFIRMED.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Jenkins v. State, 99-341.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 3, 1999
  • Starling v. State, 5D00-329.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 7, 2000
    ...General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Raley v. State, 675 So.2d 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Carson v. State, 747 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), review denied, No. SC00-81, 766 So.2d 220 (Fla. May 22, 2000). See also, Alvarez v. State, 358 So.2d 10 COBB, PETERSON and ......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 8, 2000
    ...range is irrelevant, as only the incarcerative portion of a sentence must fall within the guidelines range. See Carson v. State, 747 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. denied, No. SC00-81, 766 So.2d 220 (Fla. May 22, 2000). Defendant also claims that the Department of Corrections should b......
  • Spangler v. State, 5D01-2318.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 11, 2001
    ...General, Tallahassee, Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. See Carson v. State, 747 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. denied, 766 So.2d 220 (Fla.2000); Abdullah v. State, 679 So.2d 846 (Fla. 5th DCA AFFIRMED. SHARP, W., PLEUS and PALMER, JJ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT