Carswell v. Scott
| Decision Date | 04 December 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 25484,25484 |
| Citation | 171 S.E.2d 499,225 Ga. 798 |
| Parties | Freeman CARSWELL et al., v. Iola Bell SCOTT et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Lipshutz, Macey, Zusmann & Sikes, John M. Sikes, Jr., Charles C. Pritchard, Atlanta, for appellant.
E. E. Moore, Jr., L. Paul Cobb, Jr., T. J. Henry, Atlanta, Merritt & Pruitt, Glyndon C. Pruitt, Buford, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The appeal is from an order, entered after hearing, dissolving a temporary restraining order. Iola Bell Scott filed an action in the Civil Court of Fulton County against Freeman Carswell and others, seeking damages for personal property loss and injury resulting from the execution of a dispossessory warrant sworn out by the defendants. She asserted ownership and possession of the property on which the trespass was committed. The defendants in the civil court action filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Fulton County, claiming title by deed to the property on which the trespass was alleged to have been committed, and asserting that the deed under which the plaintiff in the civil court claimed was obtained by duress and was void. Carswell sought decree of title, damages, a quitclaim deed from the holder of a security deed on the property, and injunction against the further prosecution of the civil court case. Temporary restraining order was granted, and was dissolved after hearing.
The superior courts have exclusive jurisdiction in cases respecting title to land and equity. Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. IV, Par. I (Code Ann. § 2-3901). The basic dispute between the parties is title to the property on which the trespass was alleged to have been committed. The appellants seek a decree of title and affirmative equitable relief, which cannot be granted in the Civil Court of Fulton County. The civil court action should have been enjoined, and the actions consolidated for trial in a court having jurisdiction of the claims of both parties. Butler v. Mitchell, 128 Ga. 431 (3), 57 S.E. 764; Kirkpatrick v. Holland, 148 Ga. 708, 98 S.E. 265; Otis v. Graham Paper Co., 188 Ga. 778, 4 S.E.2d 824, 125 A.L.R. 333; Crummey v. Crummey, 190 Ga. 774(1), 10 S.E.2d 859. It was error to dissolve the order restraining the prosecution of the civil court action by the appellee.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
FELTON, J., disqualified.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brown v. Techdata Corp., Inc.
...not error nor is it enumerated as error in this appeal. See Robertson v. Barber, 229 Ga. 553, 193 S.E.2d 9 (1972); Carswell v. Scott, 225 Ga. 798, 171 S.E.2d 499 (1969); Code Ann. § 55-103 (Ga.L.1878-9, p. 139). See also Zachry v. Industrial Loan & Investment Co., 182 Ga. 738, 186 S.E. 832 ......
-
Bernath v. Malloy
...court action may be proper. See, e. g. Robertson v. Barber, 229 Ga. 553(2), 193 S.E.2d 9 (1972) (personal injury); Carswell v. Scott, 225 Ga. 798, 171 S.E.2d 499 (1969) (title to Judgment affirmed. NICHOLS, C. J., UNDERCOFLER, P. J., and JORDAN and INGRAM, JJ., concur. HILL, J., concurs in ......
-
Norment v. Wofford, 36168
...to enjoin the proceedings in the state court so that the issues presented by these facts may be tried together. Carswell v. Scott, 225 Ga. 798, 171 S.E.2d 499 (1969); Otis v. Graham Paper Co., 188 Ga. 778, 4 S.E.2d 824 Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur. 1 The State Court of Fulton ......
-
Ransom v. Waldrip, 59001
...as to specific performance and also damages the proper procedure that she should have employed was as outlined in Carswell v. Scott, 225 Ga. 798, 171 S.E.2d 499 as authorized by Code § 55-103 (enjoining proceedings or processes of court of law) requesting the superior court to enjoin the ci......