Norment v. Wofford, 36168

Decision Date09 September 1980
Docket NumberNo. 36168,36168
Citation271 S.E.2d 214,246 Ga. 281
PartiesNORMENT v. WOFFORD.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

D. Richard Jones, III, Atlanta, for appellant.

Mitchell A. Gross, Atlanta, for appellee.

UNDERCOFLER, Chief Justice.

Under Code Ann. § 55-103, the superior court in "(e)quity will not enjoin the proceedings and processes of a court of law, unless there shall be some intervening equity or other proper defense of which the party, without fault on his part, cannot avail himself at law." Appellant Norment sought an injunction under this section because she could not raise her tort counterclaim because of lack of jurisdiction 1 in the state court to entertain it. The trial court refused the injunction. We reverse.

Under the allegations of both of the complaints, 2 it appears that both claims arise out of the same factual setting. Bragg v. Gavin, 234 Ga. 70, 214 S.E.2d 532 (1975). Therefore it is error for the trial court to refuse to enjoin the proceedings in the state court so that the issues presented by these facts may be tried together. Carswell v. Scott, 225 Ga. 798, 171 S.E.2d 499 (1969); Otis v. Graham Paper Co., 188 Ga. 778, 4 S.E.2d 824 (1939).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

1 The State Court of Fulton County has no jurisdiction of tort claims resulting in personal injury.

2 Wofford sued Norment for conversion of her horse in the State Court of Fulton County. Norment sued Wofford in the Superior Court of Fulton County for defamation and false imprisonment.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Morris v. Mullis
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 2003
    ...However, that statute applies only when two actions which raise common questions of fact or law are pending before the same court. See Norment v. Wofford.36 In this case, the trial court was authorized to take jurisdiction of the Plaintiffs' probate court action and consolidate it with the ......
  • City of Rome v. Pilgrim
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 9, 1980
  • Smith v. Tronitec, Inc., No. S03A0914.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 22, 2003
    ...4. 1983 Ga. Const. art. 6, sec. 4, par. 1. 5. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hill, 218 Ga. 430, 128 S.E.2d 321 (1962). 6. Norment v. Wofford, 246 Ga. 281, 271 S.E.2d 214 (1980). 7. OCGA § ...
  • McCamy v. DeKalb County, 36287
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 9, 1980

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT