Casavecchia v. Mizrahi
Decision Date | 12 May 2009 |
Docket Number | 2008-06981. |
Parties | JOSEPH CASAVECCHIA SR., Respondent, v. WILLIAM W. MIZRAHI et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion to "restore" this action to the active calendar after it had been marked "disposed," given that CPLR 3404 does not apply to this pre-note of issue action (see Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190 [2001]), there was no 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, and there was no order dismissing the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 .
To continue reading
Request your trial12 cases
-
Rakha v. Pinnacle Bus Servs.
...v. Sterling, 86 A.D.3d 535, 926 N.Y.S.2d 320;Mitskevitch v. City of New York, 78 A.D.3d at 1138, 911 N.Y.S.2d 662;Casavecchia v. Mizrahi, 62 A.D.3d 741, 742, 877 N.Y.S.2d 906;Burdick v. Marcus, 17 A.D.3d 388, 792 N.Y.S.2d 356;123X Corp. v. McKenzie, 7 A.D.3d 769, 776 N.Y.S.2d 893;Lopez v. I......
- Schwint v. Bank St. Commons, LLC
-
Wong v. Kontonis
...natural hazard created by the storm (see Wei Wen Xie v. Ye Jiang Yong, 111 A.D.3d at 618, 974 N.Y.S.2d 113 ; Bi Chan Lin v. Po Ying Yam, 62 A.D.3d at 741, 879 N.Y.S.2d 172 ).Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the...
-
WM Specialty Mortg., LLC v. Palazzollo
...17, 21, 970 N.Y.S.2d 229 ), and there was no order dismissing the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 (see Casavecchia v. Mizrahi, 62 A.D.3d 741, 742, 877 N.Y.S.2d 906 ).RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., ...
Request a trial to view additional results