Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. Board of Trustees of Van Buren Hosp. Dist.
Decision Date | 15 January 1992 |
Citation | 601 A.2d 1085 |
Parties | CASCO NORTHERN BANK, N.A. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF VAN BUREN HOSPITAL DISTRICT, et al. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Patrick J. Scully (orally), Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, for plaintiff.
William J. Smith, Van Buren and Robert J. Plourde (orally), Plourde & Soucy, Fort Kent, for defendants.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and COLLINS, JJ.
Plaintiff Casco Northern Bank, N.A. (Casco) appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Alexander, J.) granting summary judgment to defendants Van Buren Hospital District (District), the District's Board of Trustees (Board), and the Town of Van Buren (Town) on Count II of Casco's complaint. In Count II, Casco requested that the court issue an injunction in the nature of a mandamus ordering the Board to issue a warrant to the Town assessor in an amount sufficient to cover the principal and interest payments on a note issued to Casco by the District. We conclude that the summary judgment entered against Casco on Count II was error and vacate the judgment.
In 1955, the legislature created the Van Buren Hospital District to operate a hospital in the town of Van Buren. P. & S.L. 1955, ch. 54. The District was given the power to issue bonds and notes that were legal obligations of the District. P. & S.L. 1955, ch. 54 § 4. 1 Under section 6 of the statute, the Board has the authority to issue a warrant to the Town assessors each year in an amount necessary to meet the District's expenses, including payments on notes and bonds. Section 6 states in relevant part:
The trustees of the Van Buren Hospital District shall determine what sum is required each year for sinking fund payments, or if the bonds or notes authorized by this act shall be issued to mature serially, what sum is required each year to meet the interest on said bonds or other obligations, and what sum is required each year to meet other necessary expenses in the district, and shall each year, before the 1st day of April, issue their warrant in the same form as the warrant of the Treasurer of State for taxes, with proper changes, to the assessors of the town of Van Buren, requiring that they assess the total sum so determined upon the taxable polls and estates within said district....
P. & S.L. 1955, ch. 54, § 6. Until 1989 other sources of income were sufficient to meet the District's expenses, and there was no request to invoke section 6.
In 1988, the District borrowed $50,000 from Casco to purchase new computer equipment. The District issued Casco a five-year note payable in monthly installments of $1,007.85, representing principal and interest. In 1989, after making only nine payments on the note, the hospital closed and the District stopped making payments. Casco filed suit against the District, its Board of Trustees, and the Town alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Casco asked the court to accelerate payment on the note 2 and to order the Board to issue a warrant to the Town assessors in an amount sufficient to provide for payment of the note.
The court properly refused to accelerate payment on the note, but did grant Casco judgment on all overdue amounts and left open the option for Casco to return for judgment and execution on any future payments Even though the extraordinary writs (certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, and quo warranto) have been abolished in Maine, M.R.Civ.P. 81(c), it is possible to obtain an injunction in the nature of mandamus using the procedure set out in M.R.Civ.P. 80B. Ray v. Town of Camden, 533 A.2d 912, 913 (Me.1987); 14 M.R.S.A. § 5301 (1980). Rule 80B does not, however, provide an independent basis of jurisdiction; a court may hear an 80B action only if it is authorized "by statute or otherwise authorized by law...." M.R.Civ.P. 80B(a); Ray, 533 A.2d at 913. An action for an injunction in the nature of mandamus may be "otherwise authorized by law" if it is the type of action for which the traditional writ would apply. Dowey v. Sanford Hous. Auth. 516 A.2d 957, 959-960 (Me.1986); Your Home Inc. v. City of Portland, 505 A.2d 488, 489 (Me.1986); Fletcher v. Feeney, 400 A.2d 1084, 1088 (Me.1979). Therefore, this court looks to the traditional common law of mandamus to determine if the Superior Court is authorized to hear the case and grant the relief, but may adapt the law to current conditions. Ray, 533 A.2d at 913; Dowey, 516 A.2d at 962; M.R.Civ.P. 80B advisory committee's note, 2 Field, McKusick & Wroth, Maine Civil Practice 305, 308 (2d ed. 1970).
as they came due and were not paid. The Court also granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment on Casco's request for the injunction on the ground that Casco had not exhausted its legal remedies. Casco made a timely appeal to this court from that judgment. 3
Traditionally, mandamus lies to compel governmental performance of a strictly ministerial act, that the applicant, otherwise without remedy, is entitled to have performed. Ray 533 A.2d at 913-914; Dowey, 516 A.2d at 960; Your Home, 505 A.2d at 489; Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. 117, 119, 190 A. 632 (1937). In the case at hand, we agree with Casco that the issuance of a warrant by the Board is a ministerial act that Casco is entitled to have performed, and that Casco is otherwise without a remedy that is adequate.
The courts will not grant mandamus to compel the performance of a discretionary act or in any way control the outcome of the deliberative process. Ray, 533 A.2d at 914; Rogers, 135 Me. at 119, 190 A. 632. The court may grant the injunction, however, to compel the initiation of the deliberative process after a complete refusal to act. Ray, 533 A.2d at 914; Kelly v. Curtis, 287 A.2d 426, 429 (Me.1972); Littlefield v. Newell, 85 Me. 246, 249, 27 A. 110 (1893).
Young v. Johnson, 161 Me. 64, 70, 207 A.2d 392 (1965) (quoting Nichols v. Dunton, 113 Me. 282, 283-284, 93 A. 746 (1915)); see also Rogers, 135 Me. at 119-20, 190 A. 632.
Since Casco's legal right to payment under the note has been established and is not contested in this appeal, the only question is whether Casco has a right to have the Board issue the warrant. It is well established that the laws existing at the time of the making of a contract form part of the contract. Canal Nat'l Bank v. School Admin. Dist. No. 3, 160 Me. 309, 317, 203 A.2d 734 (1964). In Canal Nat'l Bank, a statute that removed three towns from a school district was held to be an unconstitutional impairment of the rights of bondholders of the school district. Id. at 320-22, 203 A.2d 734. We concluded that the right of the bondholders to the security provided by the school district's power to tax was essential to the integrity of the bond contract. Id. at 321, 203 A.2d 734. Likewise in this case, the statute that gave the Board the responsibility to issue a warrant to the Town...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pelletier v. Lewistonf Auburn Water Pollution Control Authority
... ... early as March 22, 1996 when the Board of the Authority ... stated that they ... claim.'" Dragomir v. Spring Harbor Hosp., ... 2009 ME 51, ¶15, 970 A.2d 310 ... Bd. of Dirs. of Sch. Admin ... Dist. No. 43, 503 A.2d 233, 236 (Me. 1986) ... to have performed." Casco N. Bank, N.A. v. Bd. of ... Trs. of Van ... ...
-
Pelletier v. Lewiston Auburn Water Pollution Control Auth.
...ministerial act, that the applicant, otherwise without remedy is entitled to have performed." Casco N. Bank, N.A. v. Bd. of Trs. of Van Buren Hosp. Dist., 601 A.2d 1085, 1087 (Me. 1992). The problem with plaintiff proceeding under the June and July 2014 applications is that, under current l......
-
Friends of Cong. Square Park v. City of Portland
...rules of construction, which instruct that "[t]he word 'shall' is mandatory." Code § 1-2; see also Casco N. Bank, N.A. v. Bd. of Trs. of VanBuren Hosp. Dist., 601 A.2d 1085, 1087 (Me. 1992) ("[T]he word 'shall' is to be construed as 'must' for the purpose of sustaining or enforcing an exist......
-
Chiu v. Powers, CUM CV-99-677
... ... 282-83 nn.4 & 6; see also Casco ... Northern Bank v. Bd. of Trustees of Van Buren Hospital ... District, 601 A.2d 1085, 1087 ... ...