Cassell v. Lexington, Harrodsburg & Perryville Turnpike Road Co.
Decision Date | 27 October 1888 |
Parties | CASSELL et al. v. LEXINGTON, H. & P. TURNPIKE ROAD CO. et al. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from circuit court, Jessamine county.
Action by the Lexington, Harrodsburg & Perryville Turnpike Road Company and Bryan and others, his associates, claiming to be president and directors of the company, against John L Cassell and others, his associates, claiming the same offices. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.
R. P Jacobs and Thos. C. Bell, for appellants.
Bronaugh & Bronaugh, J. D. Hunt, and P. B. Thompson, for appellees.
The question involved in this case is whether Cassell and others or Bryan and others, appellees, are legally the president and directors of the Lexington, Harrodsburg & Perryville Turnpike Road Company. May 15, 1886, an act entitled ""An act to better protect turnpike roads in which the state is interested" was passed and approved, the provisions of which are as follows: Under that act, which was formally accepted by the stockholders of the company, Bryan and others were March 23, 1887, duly elected directors, and June 16 1887, the commissioners of the sinking fund certified to the officers of the election their approval of each of them. March 23, 1888, being the time appointed by law, another election was duly held, and Bryan and his associates were again elected. But April 12, 1888, an act entitled "An act to amend the charter of the Lexington, Harrodsburg and Perryville Turnpike Company" was passed by the legislature, which is as follows: On the first Tuesday in May, 1888, an election was held in the court-house at Harrodsburg, and, according to the return made by the officers of that election, Cassell and his associates received all the votes then cast for directors, and, after qualifying as such, and electing one of their number president, endeavored to take possession of the road, and control of gate-keepers and other employees, and to collect the money...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grant v. Elder
...It appears, then, that the relators have no title to the offices which they seek by this writ, and the writ must be quashed.' In Cassell v. L. H. & P. Co., supra, it is 'The election attempted to be held under that call must therefore be regarded as illegal, and Cassell and his associates a......
-
Citrus Growers' Development Ass'n v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n
... ... of special elections. Cassell v. Lexington, ... etc., 10 Ky. Law Rep. 486, ... ...
-
Cunningham v. Smith
... ... 25 R. C. L ... 932. In Cassell v. Lexington, H. & P. T. R. Co., 9 ... S.W. 502, ... ...