Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Retirement, 91-00504
| Citation | 593 So.2d 1116 |
| Decision Date | 31 January 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 91-00504,91-00504 |
| Parties | Richard A. CASTILLO, Jr., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, Appellee. 593 So.2d 1116, 17 Fla. L. Week. D373 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Keith F. Roberts, Tampa, for appellant.
Burton M. Michaels of Div. of Retirement, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Appellant, Richard A. Castillo, Jr., challenges the Department of Administration's (Agency) dismissal of his petition for an administrative hearing as untimely filed. We find that equity requires us to remand for a factfinding proceeding.
Appellant had sought benefits as a beneficiary of a recently deceased member of the Florida Retirement System. After discussions and correspondence with appellant concerning his claim, the Agency issued a "final agency action" letter denying appellant's claim. The letter advised that appellant could request a hearing by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing within twenty-one days of his receipt of the final agency action letter. Appellant received the letter on December 11, 1990, and mailed his petition on December 31, 1990, twenty days later.
Appellant attached an affidavit to his brief stating that he had called the Agency on December 31, and had been told by an employee of the Agency that posting within twenty-one days would satisfy the filing requirement. Appellant also attached the affidavit of his secretary, stating that she prepared the petition for mailing on December 31. However, these two affidavits were not before the Agency below when it dismissed appellant's petition as untimely.
Under section 120.68(6), Florida Statutes (1989):
When there has been no hearing prior to agency action and the reviewing court finds that the validity of the action depends upon disputed facts, the court shall order the agency to conduct a prompt, factfinding proceeding under this act after having a reasonable opportunity to reconsider its determination on the record of the proceedings.
In view of the fact that the filing of such a notice is not jurisdictional (Machules v. Dep't of Admin., 523 So.2d 1132, n. 2 (Fla.1988)), but is analogous to statutes of limitation which are subject to equitable considerations, equity requires us to remand for a factfinding proceeding to allow the agency to review the affidavits and consider appellant's arguments. See also Symons v. Dep't of Banking, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tracey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
...to raise the merits of his eligibility for unemployment benefits as a defense to repayment."); Castillo v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 593 So.2d 1116, 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (holding that "equity requires us to remand for a factfinding proceeding to allow the agency to review the affida......
-
O'Donnell's Corp. v. Ambroise
...of Bus. Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 627 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Ret., 593 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Stewart v. Department of Corr., 561 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Prohibition is inappropriate to review an order ......
-
O'Donnell's Corporation v. Ambroise, Case No. 5D03-324 (Fla. App. 5th Dist. 11/7/2003)
...of Bus. Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 627 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Ret., 593 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Stewart v. Department of Corr., 561 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Prohibition is inappropriate to review an ord......
-
McIntyre v. Seminole County School Bd., 5D00-516.
...the action depends upon disputed facts." Fla. Stat. § 120.68(7)(a) (emphasis added); see, e.g., Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Retirement, 593 So.2d 1116, 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). A teacher or contractual employee who can only be terminated for cause has a contractual property in......
-
Excuse me? The courts suggest the legislature amend APA provisions governing requests for hearing.
...1988); Stewart v. Department of Corrections, 561 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1990); Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Retirement, 593 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1992); Environmental Resource Associates of Florida, Inc. v. Department of General Services, 624 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1st D.C.......
-
The 21-day battle in administrative actions.
...so by asserting a meritorious defense, similar to being "lulled into inaction" according to Machules. (13) Castillo v. Dep't of Admin., 593 So. 2d 1116, 1117 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. (14) On remand, the hearing officer found that there was competent substantial evidence to believe the appellant and ......
-
Equitable tolling in Florida administrative proceedings.
...for appellant's rights dictates that the doctrine ... be applied." Id. at 16. In Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Retirement, 593 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), the court reversed an order that had dismissed as untimely a petition for hearing. The petitioner's attorney provided an......