Caswell v. Caswell, 63578
Decision Date | 08 April 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 63578,63578 |
Parties | CASWELL v. CASWELL et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Tom Pye, Atlanta, for appellant.
J. L. Edmondson, Lawrenceville, for appellees.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiff's complaint based on application of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. The complaint was filed on March 19, 1980, and sought damages against the following defendants for a variety of alleged wrongs having to do with the operation of a corporation in which the plaintiff holds stock and was formerly a director: J. D. Caswell, Carl Caswell, Caswell Construction Company, Inc., Development Corporation of Georgia, Inc., Tucker Investment & Mortgage Company, Inc., Northeast Metro Construction Company, and Lenora V. Caswell. The plaintiff had previously filed a complaint against all of these same defendants, except the last three, but that complaint was dismissed with prejudice on January 3, 1980, as sanction for the plaintiff's repeated failure to comply with discovery procedures and orders. See Caswell v. Caswell, 157 Ga.App 710, 278 S.E.2d 452 (1981). The plaintiff concedes that the instant suit raises many of the same claims as were asserted in the previous suit but urges that it is not barred by the doctrine of res judicata because some new factual allegations have been made, some new relief has been requested, and the three new defendants have been added.
In its order dismissing the complaint, the trial court found as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crosson v. Carrollton City Sch. Dist.
...Cir. 1987) ).McIntyre, who was hired by RA-LIN as its subcontractor, is undoubtedly in privity with RA-LIN. See Caswell v. Caswell , 162 Ga.App. 72, 290 S.E.2d 171, 172 (1982) ("If a defendant's responsibility is necessarily dependent upon the culpability of another, who was the immediate a......
-
Haynes v. Bac Home Loan Servicing, LP
...adding new parties. Endsley v. City of Macon, Ga., 321 Fed. Appx. 811, 814 (11th Cir. Nov. 20, 2008) (citing Caswell v. Caswell, 162 Ga. App. 72, 72-73, 290 S.E.2d 171, 172 (1982)). Consequently, the Court finds identity of the relevant parties in Haynes I and the present case sufficient to......
-
Wimberly v. Fort Wayne Business Products
...same act, has been adjudged not culpable, the defendant may have the benefit of that judgment as an estoppel." Caswell v. Caswell, 162 Ga.App. 72, 290 S.E.2d 171, 172 (1982). Yet even under this modern and arguably relaxed rule of privity, it is clear that defendant Fort Wayne Business Prod......
-
Bradley v. Georgia Institute of Technology
...the doctrine of res judicata may not be avoided merely by requesting different relief in a subsequent suit.' Caswell v. Caswell, 162 Ga.App. 72, 73, 290 S.E.2d 171 (1982)." (Emphasis supplied.) Waggaman v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 265 Ga. 565, 566(3), 458 S.E.2d 826 (1995). Further, the doct......