Chambers v. McGiveron

Decision Date31 October 1862
Citation33 Mo. 202
PartiesCHARLES CHAMBERS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. WILLIAM MCGIVERON, &c., Defendants in Error.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Error to St. Louis Land Court.

Glover and Wickham, for plaintiffs.

McDonald, for defendants.

BATES, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action of ejectment for the recovery of a tract of land in the county of St. Louis. The plaintiffs gave evidence tending to prove legal paper title in themselves. The defendants gave evidence tending to prove title by length of possession, under the acts of limitation.

The court instructed the jury, that, “under the evidence in this case, the jury should find for the defendants.” This instruction, under the circumstances, was evidently improper, as the court thereby usurped the whole province of the jury.

The plaintiffs asked seven instructions, which were refused; but we do not think it necessary to examine them, as they may not be applicable to the case which may be made upon a new trial, and because they involve only questions which we think are made sufficiently clear by decisions already rendered by this court.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Devlin v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1885
    ...It is only in a case, where there is no evidence that such an instruction can be sustained. Routsong v. Ry., 45 Mo. 236; Chambers v. McGovern, 33 Mo. 202; McKown v. Craig, 39 Mo. 156; McFarland v. Bellows, 49 Mo. 311. (2) The question of defendant's negligence and the contributive negligenc......
  • Liddy v. St. Louis R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 31, 1867
    ...the functions of the jury if it had given either of them-- Huelsenkamp v. Citizens' Railw. Co., 34 Mo. 45, and 37 Mo. 537; 19 Conn. 566; 33 Mo. 202; 6 Mo. 64; 10 Allen, 535; Meyer v. Pacific R. R., ante 153. The law was properly and fully declared in the instruction given, and it was not er......
  • Ettlinger v. Kahn
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 2, 1896
    ... ... or not the beneficiaries therein named as preferred creditors ... knew of and participated in the fraud. Chambers v ... McGiveron, 33 Mo. 202; McKown v. Craig, 39 Mo ... 156; Deere v. Pilant, 42 Mo. 60; Wood v. Ins ... Co., 50 Mo. 112; Grady v. Ins. Co., 60 ... ...
  • Benton v. Klein
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1867
    ...in taking the case away from the jury when there was evidence introduced. (16 Mo. 502, 496; 18 Mo. 170; 19 Mo. 451; id. 84; 27 Mo. 55; 33 Mo. 202; 34 Mo. 98; id. 147; id. 461; 5 Mo. 110; 6 Mo. 73.) II. If the parties, payee and maker, orally agreed that the doing of a certain act by the def......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT