Charbonneau v. State
| Decision Date | 26 December 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 75681,No. 75682,No. 1,No. 2,75681,1,75682,2 |
| Citation | 178 A.D.2d 815,577 N.Y.S.2d 534 |
| Parties | Patricia CHARBONNEAU, as Administratrix of the Estate of Roland Charbonneau, Deceased, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. (Claim) (Claim) Janet DALTON, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jackson C. Dalton, Deceased, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. (Claim) (Claim) |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Saperston & Day, P.C. (Thomas F. Segalla, of counsel), Buffalo, for appellants.
Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. (Michael S. Buskus, of counsel), Albany, for respondent.
Before MAHONEY, P.J., and CASEY, LEVINE, MERCURE and CREW, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Benza, J.), entered October 30, 1990, 148 Misc.2d 891, 561 N.Y.S.2d 876 which granted the State's motions to dismiss the claims.
On April 5, 1987 the New York State Thruway Authority Bridge over the Schoharie Creek in Montgomery County collapsed, causing the death of Roland Charbonneau and Jackson C. Dalton. As a result, claimants commenced the above claims against the State for wrongful death. The claims were filed with the Clerk of the Court of Claims and were served upon the Attorney-General by regular mail. The State answered, asserting the defense of lack of jurisdiction and thereafter moved to dismiss the claims on that ground. Claimants opposed the State's motions and cross-moved for leave to file late claims pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10(6) and CPLR 205(a). The Court of Claims granted the State's motions to dismiss and this appeal ensued. We affirm.
Service of the claims upon the Attorney-General by ordinary mail was insufficient to acquire jurisdiction over the State and they were, therefore, properly dismissed (see, Bogle v. State of New York, 175 A.D.2d 493, 572 N.Y.S.2d 949). Moreover, failure to properly commence the actions deprives claimants of the ameliorative tolling of the Statute of Limitations as provided for in CPLR 205(a) (see, Matter of Dreger v. New York State Thruway Auth., 177 A.D.2d 762, 575 N.Y.S.2d 743).
We reject claimants' argument that the State is estopped from asserting lack of jurisdiction. Claimants did not argue that issue in the Court of Claims and are thereby precluded from raising it on appeal (see, Gunzburg v. Gunzburg, 152 A.D.2d 537, 543 N.Y.S.2d 474). However, if we were to consider the issue we would find that estoppel is not available against the State as a matter of public policy (se...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Durkin v. Shea
...177, 610 N.Y.S.2d 647 (1994); Charbonneau v. State of New York, 148 Misc.2d 891, 561 N.Y.S.2d 876, 878 (Ct.Cl.1990), aff'd, 178 A.D.2d 815, 577 N.Y.S.2d 534 (1991); McGuirk v. City School District, 116 A.D.2d 363, 501 N.Y.S.2d 477, 478-479 (1986). Defendants argue that the Legislature's int......
-
U.S. Bank v. Speller
...proceedings, they only affect procedural steps taken after their enactment" (Charbonneau v. State of New York, 148 Misc. 891, 895, affd. 178 A.D.2d 815, affd. 81 N.Y.2d 721; see, McKinney's Consolidated Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes §55, supra; Simonson v. International Bank, 14 N.Y.2d 281, ......
-
Frontier Ins. Co. v. State
...would infringe on existing, recognized rights (see, Charbonneau v. State of New York, 148 Misc.2d 891, 561 N.Y.S.2d 876, affd.178 A.D.2d 815, 577 N.Y.S.2d 534, affd. sub nom. Dreger v. New York State Thruway Authority, 81 N.Y.2d 721, 593 N.Y.S.2d 758, 609 N.E.2d 111; Matter of McDonnell, 47......
-
Ruffolo v. Garbarini & Scher, P.C.
... ... Such a result would impair vested rights (Frontier Ins. Co. v. State of New York, 160 Misc.2d 437, 609 N.Y.S.2d 748 affd. 197 A.D.2d 177, 610 N.Y.S.2d 647; Charbonneau v. State, 148 Misc.2d 891, 895, 561 N.Y.S.2d 876, ... ...