Charlotte Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State ex rel. Lanier
Decision Date | 25 October 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 7210SC598,7210SC598 |
Citation | 192 S.E.2d 57,16 N.C.App. 381 |
Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
Parties | CHARLOTTE LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE of North Carolina ex rel. Edwin S. LANIER, Commissioner of Insurance. |
Atty. Gen. Robert Morgan and Associate Atty. Gen. Benjamin H. Baxter, Jr., for respondent appellee (North Carolina Commissioner of Insurance).
Cansler, Lockhart & Eller, P.A., by Thomas R. Eller, Jr., and Richard D. Stephens, Charlotte, for petitioner appellant.
We express no opinion as to whether the proposed lease between the insurance company and George H. Talbot, President and Treasurer of the company, would be in violation of the provisions of G.S. § 58--79(b)(3).
Article IV of the North Carolina Constitution provides:
Section 1. Judicial power. The judicial power of the State shall, except as provided in Section 3 of this Article, be vested in a Court for the Trial of Impeachments and in a General Court of Justice. The General Assembly shall have on power to eeprive the judicial department of any power or jurisdiction that rightfully pertains to it as a co-ordinate department of the government, nor shall it establish or authorize any courts other than as permitted by this Article.
Sec. 3. Judicial powers of administrative agencies. The General Assembly may best in administrative agencies established pursuant to law such judicial powers as may be reasonably necessary as an incident to the accomplishment of the purposes for which the agencies were created. Appeals from administrative agencies sahll be to the General Court of Justice.
The General Assembly is empowered to confer on the Commissioner of Insurance only those judicial powers reasonably necessary as an incident to the accomplishment of the purposes for which the Department of Insurance was created. State ex rel. Lanier v. Vines, 274 N.C. 486, 164 S.E.2d 161 (1968).
Express powers delegated by statute and implied powers reasonably necessary for its proper functioning are the only powers which an administrative agency possesses. In Great American Insurance Company v. Gold, 254 N.C. 168, 173, 118 S.E.2d 792, 796 (1961) it is stated, 'Administrative boards have only such authority as is properly conferred upon them by the Legislature.' Thus, it is clear that administrative agencies must find within the statutes justification for any authority which they purport to exercise. In 2 Am.Jur.2d Administrative Law § 463 (1962) it is stated:
The Commissioner of Insurance of North Carolina is charged with the duty under G.S. § 58--9 with administering the laws of the State with regard to the insurance industry. Specific powers and duties are statutorily conferred upon the Commissioner to aid him in the administration of the insurance laws. G.S. § 58--38 provides:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
IN RE DECLARATORY RULING BY COM'R OF INS.
...the insurance laws of the State, and does not confer any other express powers or duties. Charlotte Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State ex rel. Lanier, 16 N.C.App. 381, 384, 192 S.E.2d 57, 59 (1972) ("The Commissioner of Insurance of North Carolina is charged with the duty under G.S. s 58-9 with ......
-
Petruzzo v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
...Regarding 11 N.C.A.C. 12.0319, 134 N.C.App. 22, 28–29, 517 S.E.2d 134 (1999) ; see also Charlotte Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. North Carolina ex rel. Lanier, 16 N.C.App. 381, 384, 192 S.E.2d 57 (1972) (noting that the provision of the Insurance Law authorizing the Commissioner to "adopt ... rul......
-
Discovery Ins. Co. v. N.C. Dep't of Ins.
...losses arising out of claims handling."Discovery cites two cases it asserts are analogous to the case at bar. Charlotte Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State ex rel. Lanier dealt with whether the Commissioner of Insurance had the authority to enforce an insurance rule by issuing a letter ordering ......
-
Whittington v. North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources
...state must justify any authority which administrative agencies purport to exercise. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lanier, Comr. of Insurance, 16 N.C.App. 381, 384, 192 S.E.2d 57, 59 (1972). There is no such justification from the General Statutes in the case at Second, in Genera......