Child X, Matter of, C-3
| Decision Date | 10 October 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. C-3,C-3 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Parental Rights to CHILD X, a minor. DB, Appellant (Respondent), v. MM and BM, Appellees (Petitioners). |
| Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
James R. Bell, Casper, for appellant.
Jerry A. Yaap, Casper, for appellees.
Before RAPER, C. J., and McCLINTOCK, THOMAS, ROSE and ROONEY, JJ.
In this case, the trial court terminated the parental rights in Child X of his natural mother, DB, and awarded permanent care, control and custody to MM and BM, the mother and stepfather of X's father. The parental rights were terminated upon a finding by the trial court of abuse and neglect on the part of the natural mother.
On appeal, the mother challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of abuse and neglect, particularly in light of our decision in DS v. Dept. of Public Assistance and Social Services, Wyo., 607 P.2d 911 (1980), which was announced subsequent to the trial judge's decision letter in the instant case.
However, our research discloses an issue which forecloses our reaching the merits of this case. In the district court proceeding, no attorney was appointed to represent the best interests of the child, and none has appeared at the appellate level.
Section 14-3-211(a), W.S.1977, 1978 Supp., provides:
(Emphasis supplied.)
Section 14-3-202(a)(v), W.S.1977, 1978 Supp., provides this definition:
"(v) 'Court proceedings' means child protective proceedings which have as their purpose the protection of a child through an adjudication of whether the child is abused or neglected, and the making of an appropriate order of disposition;"
Compliance with § 14-3-211(a), supra, is mandatory and, therefore, it was improper for the district court to adjudicate the substantive issues without appointing an attorney to protect the welfare of the child.
Since the proceedings below were fatally defective, the orders emanating therefrom are reversed and the matter is remanded to the district court, where a guardian ad litem shall be appointed and a new hearing conducted.
Reversed.
I wholeheartedly concur in the disposition of this case. I am not persuaded that the provisions of § 14-3-211(a), W.S.1977 (1978 Supp.), were intended by the legislature to apply in proceedings conducted pursuant to §...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
JL, In Interest of, C-88-1
...of whether the child is abused or neglected, and the making of an appropriate order of disposition. (Emphasis added.) In Matter of Child X, 617 P.2d 1078, 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (Wyo.1980), decided before the enactment of W.S. 14-2-312, we said that compliance with W.S. 14-3-211(a) is mandatory pri......
-
Nation v. Nation
...interest of the children, without the conflict of parental emotion, should be secured by primary representation. Matter of Parental Right to Child X, Wyo., 617 P.2d 1078 (1980). In this case we find, in the absence of either a motion to intervene in the divorce case, Susan B. Nation, Plaint......
-
A v. X, Y, and Z
...the State is bound to protect during minority. Rule 17(c), W.R.C.P. See also, In the Matter of Parental Rights to Child X, * * * (Wyo., 617 P.2d 1078 (1980) And see DS v. Department of Public Assistance and Social Services, Wyo., 607 P.2d 911 (1980). The trial court continued its proper ana......
-
TR, Matter of, C-88-10
...been appointed to represent the interests of the children as required in termination proceedings by this Court's decision in DB v. MM, 617 P.2d 1078 (Wyo.1980), and by Wyo.Stat. § 14-3-211(a) (1977). Mandate on reversal issued from this Court on October 28, 1986. On November 17, 1986, the S......