Childs v. Sammons
Decision Date | 11 September 2000 |
Docket Number | No. S00A0929.,S00A0929. |
Citation | 534 S.E.2d 409,272 Ga. 737 |
Parties | CHILDS v. SAMMONS et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Bush, Crowley, Leverett & Leggett, J. Wayne Crowley, Macon, for appellant.
Anderson, Walker & Reichert, Albert P. Reichert, Jr., Jeanna G. Fennell, Macon, for appellees.
Helen Childs filed a petition to quiet title to a 40-foot strip of land which allegedly separated her tract from that owned by Ellis and Mira Sammons (Appellees). According to Ms. Childs, the disputed area is a former street dedicated to, but eventually abandoned by, the City of Gray. The City denied that the property once was one of its streets, and it made no claim of any interest in the strip. Appellees defended on the basis that the property never was dedicated as a municipal street and that they acquired prescriptive title thereto. After a hearing, the special master recommended that the trial court decree that Appellees are the owners of the disputed property, but he failed to make appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court adopted the special master's report and, on appeal, we reversed and remanded for the entry of a new judgment containing the requisite findings and conclusions. Childs v. Sammons, 271 Ga. 161, 516 S.E.2d 779 (1999). On remand, the special master made a new report containing the findings and conclusions relied upon to support a recommended decree of prescriptive title in Appellees. Ms. Childs appeals from the order of the trial court adopting the recommendation of the special master on remand.
1. According to Ms. Childs, the evidence does not authorize a decree of prescriptive title in Appellees, but demands a finding that the property is an abandoned public street. She does not contend that the strip was ever formally or expressly dedicated to and accepted by the City. Instead, she relies upon the principle of implied dedication and acceptance.
Dunaway v. Windsor, supra at 706(9), 30 S.E.2d 627. The plaintiff did not proffer any evidence that the City ever maintained the strip as a municipal street open for public use. Although it appears that the county would scrape and grade the area periodically, "[i]t is established that by permitting public authorities to occasionally scrape and grade a private road, a property owner does not manifest an intention to dedicate the roadway." Chandler v. Robinson, 269 Ga. 881, 882(1), 506 S.E.2d 121 (1998). Thus, the evidence did not demand a finding that the strip was impliedly dedicated to and accepted either by the City or the county as a public street.
2. Ms. Childs urges that the trial court erroneously predicated its decree upon the special master's finding that Appellees hold prescriptive title to the strip. This finding requires proof that Appellees' possession did not originate in fraud and that it was public, continuous, exclusive, uninterrupted, peaceable and accompanied by a claim of right. OCGA § 44-5-161. Here, the evidence...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Norton v. Holcomb
...omitted). 7. Moody v. Degges, 258 Ga.App. 135, 137, 573 S.E.2d 93 (2002), citing OCGA § 44-5-161. See also Childs v. Sammons, 272 Ga. 737, 739(2), 534 S.E.2d 409 (2000). 8. (Footnote omitted.) Moody, supra. 9. See id. Though Moody states that the prescriber must show uninterrupted use for s......
-
Braley v. City Of Forest Park
...either in express terms or by implication resulting from the maintenance of a way public in its nature. Childs v. Sammons, 272 Ga. 737, 738(1), 534 S.E.2d 409 (2000). And, there was no evidence that the City or other governmental body maintained the property at issue, or otherwise accepted ......
-
DeFoor v. DeFoor
...to reside on the property in order to establish adverse possession; he only needed to exercise dominion over it. See Childs v. Sammons, 272 Ga. 737, 739(2), 534 S.E.2d 409 (2000) (indicia of dominion included cultivating garden, harvesting trees, maintaining roads, hunting and excluding oth......
-
Strozzo v. Coffee Bluff Marina Property
...Justice Carley, a majority of the Supreme Court of Georgia transferred these cases to the Court of Appeals. Compare Childs v. Sammons, 272 Ga. 737, 534 S.E.2d 409 (2000) (petition to quiet title). 2. Desai v. Silver Dollar City, 229 Ga.App. 160, 163(1), 493 S.E.2d 540 (1997) (whole court). ......
-
Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
...thus affirmed the trial judge's award of summary judgment to the county. 246 Ga. App. at 268, 540 S.E.2d at 250. 303. Childs v. Sammons, 272 Ga. 737, 534 S.E.2d 409 (2000). 304. 272 Ga. 737, 534 S.E.2d 409 (2000). Plaintiff maintained that the strip was an abandoned public street. The defen......
-
Real Property
...17. Houston, 358 Ga. App. at 513, 855 S.E.2d at 717 (quoting Simmons, 286 Ga. at 6, 685 S.E.2d at 77).18. Id. (quoting Childs v. Sammons, 272 Ga. 737, 739, 534 S.E.2d 409, 410 (2000)).19. Houston, 358 Ga. App. at 513, 855 S.E.2d at 717.20. Id. at 513-14, 855 S.E.2d at 717.21. Id. at 514, 85......