Churchill v. Allessio

Decision Date21 December 1998
Citation723 A.2d 324,247 Conn. 951
PartiesAlexander CHURCHILL et al. v. Eunice ALLESSIO, Executrix (Estate of Eva Churchelow), et al.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

Frederick E. Mascolo, Waterbury, in support of the petition.

Gary P. Sklaver and Irving H. Perlmutter, New Haven, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 51 Conn.App. 24, 719 A.2d 913 (1998), is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Wendt v. Wendt
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • 5 Septiembre 2000
    ...A.2d 191 (1985)." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Churchill v. Allessio, 51 Conn. App. 24, 38, 719 A.2d 913, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 951, 723 A.2d 324 (1998); see Practice Book § 997, now § The plaintiffs delay in raising her claims stems from little more than an attempt to manufacture ......
  • Perez v. D and L Tractor Trailer School
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • 27 Octubre 2009
    ...51 Conn.App. 24, 36, 719 A.2d 913 (trial on second, subsequent will was not same action as trial on first will), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 951, 723 A.2d 324 (1998). The court explained that the prior testimony was hearsay given in an unemployment hearing, in which the issues were not the same......
  • State v. Moore
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • 25 Septiembre 2001
    ...cert. denied, 247 Conn. 958, 723 A.2d 814 (1999), and Churchill v. Allessio, 51 Conn. App. 24, 38, 719 A.2d 913, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 951, 723 A.2d 324 (1998). Both of these cases stand for the principle that if the court's conduct during trial is such that it indicates an appearance of ......
  • American Heritage Agency, Inc. v. Gelinas
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • 10 Abril 2001
    ...Corp., 246 Conn. 594, 604, 717 A.2d 713 (1998)." Churchill v. Allessio, 51 Conn. App. 24, 34, 719 A.2d 913, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 951, 723 A.2d 324 (1998). Here, the court found that the signature on the March 1, 1989 minutes was that of the defendant. The court found that the plaintiff h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT