Cinelli v. Radcliffe

• Decision Date: 23 November 1970
• Citation: Cinelli v. Radcliffe, 317 N.Y.S.2d 97, 35 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
• Parties: Maryanne CINELLI, an infant, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Peter RADCLIFFE, infant, etc., Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 97

317 N.Y.S.2d 97

35 A.D.2d 829

Maryanne CINELLI, an infant, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Peter RADCLIFFE, infant, etc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Nov. 23, 1970.

Bernard J. Gomberg, New York City, for plaintiffs-respondents, by Mortimer H. Israel, New York City, of counsel on the Brief.

Simone & Brant, Jamaica, for defendants-appellants; To be argued by Seymour Armstrong, Jamaica.

Before CHRIST, P.J., and RABIN, HOPKINS, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, JJ., concur.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 27, 1970, which granted plaintiffs' motion to strike out defendant's answer for failure to submit to examination before trial and ordered an inquest.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to plaintiffs, and plaintiffs' motion granted only to the extent of precluding defendant from testifying at the trial unless he (1) submits to an examination before trial on such date and place as shall be fixed by plaintiffs by written notice of not less than 10 days served upon defendant's attorney and (2) pays $250 to plaintiffs' attorney five days before such date for examination.

In our opinion, the striking of an answer is an extreme and drastic penalty which should not be invoked where, as at bar, the moving affidavit fails to show conclusively that the default in appearing on examination before trial was clearly deliberate or contumacious (Du Bois v. Iovinella, 15 A.D.2d 616, 222 N.Y.S.2d 460). Other sanctions, such as are herein imposed, are more appropriate (Thornlow v. Long Is. R.R. Co., 33 A.D.2d 1027, 307 N.Y.S.2d 1017; Goldner v. Lendor...