Du Bois v. Iovinella

Decision Date29 December 1961
Citation15 A.D.2d 616,222 N.Y.S.2d 460
PartiesMildred DU BOIS, Plaintiff, and Frederick DuBois, Appellant, v. Silvino IOVINELLA, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Alexander Grasso, Frank N. Grasso, Schenectady, for appellant.

Carter & Conboy, Albany, Forrest N. Case, Jr., Albany, for respondent.

Before BERGAN, P. J., and COON, GIBSON, REYNOLDS and TAYLOR, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term entered in the Schenectady County Clerk's office on April 26, 1961 which granted a motion by defendant for an order striking the pleading of plaintiff, Frederick DuBois, pursuant to section 299 of the Civil Practice Act. The moving affidavit does not demonstrate the default of appellant to have been so clearly deliberate or contumacious as to justify the extreme and drastic relief which has been granted. We think that he ought to be afforded another opportunity to appear for examination.

Order reversed and the motion to strike the pleading denied, without costs. If the parties are unable to agree as to the time when, place where and officer before whom the examination shall proceed, settle order on notice.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Barbato v. Tuosto
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1963
    ...of the section, the failure to comply must be contumacious. (Vastola v. Canariato, 8 A.D.2d 961, 190 N.Y.S.2d 496; Du Bois v. Iovinella, 15 A.D.2d 616, 222 N.Y.S.2d 460.) I do not believe that the lawful assertion of a constitutional privilege may be so characterized and conclude that Secti......
  • Cinelli v. Radcliffe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 23, 1970
    ...show conclusively that the default in appearing on examination before trial was clearly deliberate or contumacious (Du Bois v. Iovinella, 15 A.D.2d 616, 222 N.Y.S.2d 460). Other sanctions, such as are herein imposed, are more appropriate (Thornlow v. Long Is. R.R. Co., 33 A.D.2d 1027, 307 N......
  • Buy-Rite Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, BUY-RITE
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 30, 1967
    ...not willful and they should not be deprived of their day in court (Nomako v. Ashton, 22 A.D.2d 683, 253 N.Y.S.2d 309; Du Bois v. Iovinella, 15 A.D.2d 616, 222 N.Y.S.2d 460). ...
  • Mountain Equities, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 13, 1977
    ...prima facie, to comply therewith. (CPLR 3126; Balsam v. Nicolosi Building Co., Inc., 36 A.D.2d 533, 318 N.Y.S.2d 658; Du Bois v. Iovinella, 15 A.D.2d 616, 222 N.Y.S.2d 460.) Accordingly, it was, in the circumstances here, an improvident exercise of discretion to dismiss the complaint (CPLR ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT