Cipolla v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 35064
| Decision Date | 16 October 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 35064,35064 |
| Citation | 244 Ga. 444,260 S.E.2d 482 |
| Parties | CIPOLLA et al. v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Saul, Blount & Martin, Percy J. Blount, Wyck A. Knox, Jr., David M. Zacks, Augusta, Alston, Miller & Gaines, Ben F. Johnson, III, Steven M. Collins, Atlanta, for appellants.
Hull, Towill, Norman, Barrett & Johnson, David E. Hudson, Augusta, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, John T. Marshall, David G. Ross, Atlanta, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., James C. Pratt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
Appellants are shareholders and former directors of the First Augusta Bank & Trust Company, hereinafter the bank, which was closed by the Georgia Department of Banking & Finance on May 20, 1977, because the bank was insolvent. Appellees are the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, hereinafter FDIC, and the Department of Banking & Finance. FDIC was appointed receiver of the bank when it was closed. Fifteen months later, after they were sued in federal court by the FDIC, the appellants filed a motion to intervene and a motion to set aside judgment in the original receivership proceeding. Both motions were denied by the superior court and appellants appeal.
We affirm.
The superior court found, inter alia, that appellants' motion to intervene was not timely filed. Whether an intervention is timely is a matter within the sound discretion of the court and that decision will not be controlled absent an abuse of discretion. State of Ga. v. Bruce, 231 Ga. 783, 204 S.E.2d 106 (1974). Appellants seek to intervene fifteen months after the judgment they wish to set aside was rendered and after all depositors and creditors of the defunct bank have been paid. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion.
Appellants, not being parties to the receivership proceeding, have no standing to file motions in that proceeding.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Dye
...motions to set aside the sale. See In re First Augusta Bank & Trust Co., No. 5814-C (Super.Ct. Nov. 3, 1978), aff'd, Cipolla v. FDIC, 244 Ga. 444, 260 S.E.2d 482 (1979). Under Hurt Building Jerry Dye's failure to do so precludes any subsequent attack by him on the sale under Georgia law. Th......
-
Kubler v. Goerg, s. A90A0897
...not entered until some ten months thereafter. See generally First Nat. Bank in Newnan v. Blackburn, supra. Compare Cipolla v. F.D.I.C., 244 Ga. 444, 260 S.E.2d 482 (1979); Harkness v. State of Ga., 185 Ga.App. 770, 365 S.E.2d 552 (1988); Doe v. Garcia, 177 Ga.App. 61, 338 S.E.2d 710 (1985).......
- Walker v. Bogle
-
Wigley v. Hambrick, s. A89A1272
...sound discretion of the court and that decision will not be controlled absent an abuse of discretion. [Cit.]" Cipolla v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 244 Ga. 444, 260 S.E.2d 482 (1979); Doe v. Garcia, 177 Ga.App. 61, 62, 338 S.E.2d 710 (1985); Harkness v. State, 185 Ga.App. 770, 365 S.E.2d 552 ......