City of Atlanta v. Gilmere
Decision Date | 04 April 1984 |
Docket Number | Nos. 40603,40598,s. 40603 |
Citation | 314 S.E.2d 204,252 Ga. 406 |
Parties | CITY OF ATLANTA v. GILMERE et al. GILMERE et al. v. CITY OF ATLANTA. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Marva Jones Brooks, Mary Carole Cooney, Atlanta, for City of Atlanta.
J.M. Raffauf, Decatur, Carroll Charles Craig, Locust Grove, for Emma F. Gilmere et al.
Gilmere obtained a judgment against Craig arising out of circumstances wherein Craig, as a police officer of the City of Atlanta, was acting in the scope of his governmental employment while responding to an emergency. Seeking to collect the judgment, she filed garnishment proceedings against the City of Atlanta. The City answered the summons of garnishment, setting out Craig's earnings, alleging a certain sum to be exempt from garnishment, and paying the remainder into court. Gilmere traversed the answer of the City, and filed a motion for summary judgment, as did the City.
The trial court granted Gilmere's motion for summary judgment and entered judgment against the City of Atlanta for the entire amount of the judgment which Gilmere previously had obtained against Craig.
The Court of Appeals, 168 Ga.App. 773, 310 S.E.2d 736, affirmed the holding to the City's liability. We granted the City's petition for writ of certiorari, positing the following question: "Whether OCGA § 18-4-21 (Code Ann. § 43-306) waives municipal immunity from lawsuit when the judgment serving as the basis for issuance of the summons of garnishment arises out of liability incurred in the scope of the official's or employee's governmental employment while responding to an emergency."
* * *
* * *
The issue here is, of course, whether OCGA § 18-4-21 (Code Ann. § 46-306) serves to eliminate pro tanto the immunity of municipal governments from liability for the torts of its agents. That section provides in part as follows:
(Emphasis supplied.)
The history of this Code section militates against the relief granted by the trial court.
In 1976, the General Assembly enacted a broad revision of the laws pertaining to garnishment, then codified as Ga.Code Ann. Ch. 46-1; Ga.L.1976, pp. 1608, et seq. Former § 46-306 of the new chapter (Ga.Laws 1976, pp. 1613, 1615) provided, in part, as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Henry Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
... ... not be favored." (punctuation omitted)); City of ... Atlanta v. Gilmere , 252 Ga. 406, 408 (314 S.E.2d 204) ... (1984) (same) ... ...
-
Norton v. Cobb County
...analyzing the RPA, it was in error. "Implied waivers of governmental immunity should not be favored. [Cit.]" City of Atlanta v. Gilmere, 252 Ga. 406, 409, 314 S.E.2d 204 (1984). See also Eibel v. Forrester, 194 Ga. 439, 442, 22 S.E.2d 96 (1942); Hughes v. Ga. Dept. of Corrections, 267 Ga. A......
-
Anstadt v. Bd. Of Regents Of The Univ. System Of Ga.
...In this regard, “(i)mplied waivers of governmental immunity should not be favored.” (Citation omitted.) City of Atlanta v. Gilmere, 252 Ga. 406, 409, 314 S.E.2d 204 (1984); College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Ed. Expense Bd., 527 U.S. 666, 682(IV), 119 S.Ct. 2219, 144 L.Ed......
-
Pelham v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga.
...should not be favored.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Currid, 285 Ga. at 186, 674 S.E.2d 894. See City of Atlanta v. Gilmere, 252 Ga. 406, 409, 314 S.E.2d 204 (1984). Georgia's anti-hazing law, OCGA § 16–5–61, provides: (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) “Haze” means to s......
-
Workers' Compensation - H. Michael Bagley and J. Benson Ward
...at 341, 434 S.E.2d at 59). 181. 252 Ga. 404, 314 S.E.2d 432 (1984). 182. Creeden, 296 Ga. App. at 98, 673 S.E.2d at 613 (citing Manning, 252 Ga. at 406, 314 S.E.2d at 434). In Manning the court held as follows: "Owners or entities merely in possession or control of the premises would not be......
-
Georgia's Public Whistleblower Statute
...that "implied waivers of governmental immunity should not be favored." Id. at 95, 751 S.E. 2d at 310 (quoting City of Atlanta v. Gilmere, 252 Ga. 406, 409, 314 S.E.2d 204, 206 (1984)). "This does not mean, however, that the Legislature must use specific 'magic words' such as 'sovereign immu......