City of Birmingham v. Brasher
Decision Date | 19 May 1978 |
Citation | 359 So.2d 1153 |
Parties | CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. Cammie Olivia BRASHER. 77-108. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Thomas P. Anderson, Birmingham, for appellant.
S. Shay Samples, Earl R. Peyton and Hogan, Smith & Alspaugh, Birmingham, for appellee.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages to Brasher, in a suit against the City, alleging negligent maintenance of a sidewalk in a public park. We affirm.
On December 26, 1974, Cammie Olivia Brasher fell and sustained hip injuries, while walking on a sidewalk located on the perimeter of Woodrow Wilson Park. She fell when she stubbed her foot on an elevated portion of concrete walkway.
This specific sidewalk Wilson Park is criss-crossed with walkways leads from a public street to the entrance of the Jefferson County Courthouse. Not only were there elevated portions of concrete, but also there were cracks and depressions in the sidewalk. There was testimony that these conditions had existed for a long period of time prior to Mrs. Brasher's fall. There had been previous injuries suffered by persons as a result of stumbling and falling on the sidewalk. The Engineering Department, as well as the City Legal Department, had been warned on numerous occasions, by the Jefferson County Director of General Services of the delapidated condition of the sidewalk. Yet, the City did nothing to improve or to repair it. As late as August 16, 1974, the Jefferson County Commissioner of Public Improvements wrote a letter to a City Councilman stating:
The issue before this court is whether the City is immune from suit, and liable for damages resulting from the negligent maintenance of the sidewalk. On this issue we are presented with an attack upon the viability of Jones v. City of Birmingham, 284 Ala. 276, 224 So.2d 632 (1969), where this court held the City of Birmingham immune from liability for a defect in a walkway within Woodrow Wilson Park under Tit. 62, § 660, Code of Alabama 1940 (Recomp.1958). 1 Seven years later, Justice Bloodworth, in a specially concurring opinion in Walker v. City of Birmingham, 342 So.2d 321 (Ala.Sup.Ct.1976), addressed the Jones case:
Walker was a suit for injuries sustained on a sidewalk in the Jimmy Morgan Zoo in Birmingham. Justice Embry, writing the primary opinion, stated that although a contract action was available, the City was immunized from tort suits. He was joined by Justice Beatty. However, the remainder of the court had somewhat differing views. Justice Bloodworth was of the opinion that the plaintiffs had an actionable tort claim, but that a contract action was improper. Justices Maddox and Faulkn...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Christopher v. Christopher (In re Christopher.)
...title in, certain property, courts should be loath to destroy such rights when overruling prior decisions.”); and City of Birmingham v. Brasher, 359 So.2d 1153, 1155 (Ala.1978) (“ ‘[A] court of final decision may expressly define and declare the effect of a decision overruling a former deci......
-
Ex Parte Capstone Bldg. Corp.
...was expressly articulated in the following passage from Corpus Juris Secundum quoted with approval by this Court in City of Birmingham v. Brasher, 359 So. 2d 1153 (Ala. 1978), though our research has not found any express repetition of it in more recent cases:"'As a general rule, the effect......
-
City of Birmingham v. Blount County
...ruling that had made Birmingham immune from suit for injuries arising on sidewalks in its public parks. Then, in City of Birmingham v. Brasher, 359 So.2d 1153, 1155 (Ala.1978), this Court held that the Walker decision applied to Brasher's injury suffered two years before the Walker decision......
-
State v. Morrison Cafeterias Consol., Inc. of Delaware
...must be exercised on a case by case basis. Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (1965); City of Birmingham v. Brasher, 359 So.2d 1153 (Ala.1978). As stated in Cooper v. Hawkins, 234 Ala. 636, 638, 176 So. 329, 331 (1937), "where parties have acted upon the law a......