City of Cape Girardeau v. Fougeu
Decision Date | 24 April 1888 |
Citation | 30 Mo.App. 551 |
Parties | CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, Plaintiff in Error, v. PAULINE A. FOUGEU, Defendant in Error. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
ERROR to the Cape Girardeau Circuit Court, HON. H. C. O'BRYAN Judge.
Affirmed.
SAM. M. GREEN, for the plaintiff in error: The city of Cape Girardeau derives its power to construct and repair curbstones and sidewalks from the charter granted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri. Laws of Missouri, 1872, art. 3, secs 6, 41; art. 6, sec. 1; art. 7, sec. 11. The ordinance set out in the petition gives full effect to the charter power above referred to. McCormack v. Patchin, 53 Mo. 33; Neir v. Railroad, 12 Mo.App. 25; 1 Dillon Mun. Corp. [3 Ed.] sec. 328. The legislative will was clearly expressed in the charter, and the ordinance should stand. State v. Clark, 54 Mo. 17, 36. In the ordinance in question, there was no delegation of power by resolution, as contended for by respondent in her demurrer. State ex rel. v. Pond, 93 Mo. 606; Hitchcock v Galveston, 96 U.S. 341; 1 Dillon Mun. Corp. [[[[[[3 Ed.] sec. 96; St. Louis v. Alexander, 23 Mo. 483: Cooley's Const. Lim. [[[3 Ed.] 117; State v. Winkelmeyer, 35 Mo. 103; State ex rel. v. Mayor, 37 Mo. 270; State v. Binder, 38 Mo. 451; Township Organization Act, 55 Mo. 295; State ex rel. v. Wilcox, 45 Mo. 465.
F. E. BURROUGH and R. H. WHITELAW, for the defendant in error: The difference between a resolution and an ordinance is too simple to require any discussion or citation of authorities; suffice it to say that an ordinance is a law, after it has been passed by the council and approved by the mayor, as is provided by sections thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, and eighteen of article two of the charter. But a resolution is simply a direction, request, or suggestion. Saxton v. Beach, 50 Mo. 488; Saxton v. City of St. Joseph, 60 Mo. 153; Irvin v. Devors, 65 Mo. 625.
The city of Cape Girardeau appears to be working under a special charter granted by the legislature in 1872. Act of March 29, 1872; Laws of 1872, pp. 328, 345. By section six of article three of this elaborate statute, it is provided that " the mayor and council shall have power within the city, by ordinance * * * to open, alter, abolish, widen, extend, establish, grade, pave, or otherwise improve, clean, and keep in repair, streets, avenues, lanes, and alleys, wharves, and public grounds, and squares."
By section forty-one of the same article, the mayor and city council have power within the city, by ordinance, " to remove all obstructions from the sidewalks, and to provide for the construction and repair of all sidewalks and curbstones, and for the cleaning of the same, and of the gutters, at the expense of the owners of the grounds fronting thereon."
By section eleven of article seven of the same statute, it is provided: " The mayor and council of the city of Cape Girardeau shall have power, by ordinance, to require the owner or owners of any lot, or lots, fronting on any street that shall have been curbed and paved, or macadamized, by the authorities of said city, to pave the sidewalks in front of their respective lots at the expense of said owner or owners; and if the said owners shall fail or refuse to comply with said ordinance, then the mayor and city council shall proceed to have the said sidewalks made, and shall have a lien for the costs of the same upon said lots, in front of which they shall have made the sidewalks; and shall have power to recover the same, together with all costs of suit, before any court having competent jurisdiction in cases of debt of like amount, in favor of the city."
With the above statutes in force, the city of Cape Girardeau, according to the recitals of the petition in this case, passed, on the twenty-ninth of April, 1882, the following ordinance, numbered 374, and entitled " Sidewalks and Curbstones. " :
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The City of Unionville v. Martin
... ... Hoag, 62 Mo.App. 672; Wheeler v. City of Poplar ... Bluff, 149 Mo. 36; Cape Girardeau v. Fougeu, 30 ... Mo.App. 551; Werth v. City of Springfield, 22 ... Mo.App. 12; City to ... ...
-
Aurora Water Company v. City of Aurora
...v. Van Studdiford, 86 Mo. 149; State ex rel. v. Sherman, 42 Mo. 210 (214). Mooney v. Kennett, 19 Mo. 551; Cape Girardeau v. Fougou, 30 Mo.App. 551. Was the city empowered under the constitution and laws of the state, to enter into such a contract as set out in the petition? It would devolve......
-
City of Tarkio v. Clark
... ... ordinance. Secs. 5955, 5956 and 5957, R. S. 1899; Hisey ... v. Charleston, 62 Mo.App. 381; Cape Girardeau v ... Fongue, 30 Mo.App. 551; Poplar Bluff v. Hoag, ... 62 Mo.App. 672; Springfield v ... ...
-
Wheeler v. City of Poplar Bluff
... ... 612; Railroad v. Governor, ... 23 Mo. 353; St. Louis v. Foster, 52 Mo. 513; ... Cape Girardeau v. Riley, 52 Mo. 424; Becker v ... Washington, 94 Mo. 395; State ex rel. v. Mead, ... Kansas City, 84 Mo. 419; Moore v ... Cape Girardeau, 103 Mo. 475; Cape Girardeau v ... Fougeu, 30 Mo.App. 551. (3) The burden is on the ... plaintiff in this case to show the formal adoption ... ...