City of Florissant v. Lee
| Decision Date | 15 July 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 50101,50101 |
| Citation | 714 S.W.2d 871 |
| Parties | CITY of FLORISSANT, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Robert Fenner LEE and James Lee, Defendants/Appellants. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
James M. Lee, pro se.
V. Jack Muehlenkamp, Dellwood, for plaintiff/respondent.
Defendants, Robert Fenner Lee and James Lee, appeal from the judgment of the trial court permanently enjoining them from maintaining a junkyard and from storing trash, rubbish and inoperable motor vehicles on real property known as 435 Graham Road, and finding them in civil contempt for violating two prior injunctions prohibiting similar activities on the adjacent property known as 445 Graham Road. Two separate fines of $2,500 each were imposed on both defendants, jointly and severally. The trial court consolidated the present action prohibiting the operation of a junkyard at 435 Graham Road and two prior actions enjoining similar activities on the back and front portions of 445 Graham Road and granted one permanent injunction which covered both properties. The trial court ordered "all stored materials, rubbish and trash, inoperable motor vehicles and the parts thereof, and any buildings which are not authorized" to be removed within six months from the date of its order. The trial court did not designate the injunction it granted as a final judgment for purposes of appeal nor did the parties request that it do so. See Rule 81.06. We dismiss the appeal without prejudice as premature.
Although not questioned by the parties, we consider the issue of the appealability of the trial court's judgment sua sponte. Hamilton v. Hamilton, 661 S.W.2d 82, 83 (Mo.App.1983). In order for an appeal to lie, there must be a final judgment or order. § 512.020, RSMo (1978); Hamilton, 661 S.W.2d at 83. A final judgment is one which disposes of all parties and issues in the case. Higgins v. Smith, 694 S.W.2d 496, 497 (Mo.App.1985). Because the trial court consolidated all cases into one proceeding and did not designate any claim or issue as final pursuant to Rule 81.06, each separate issue and claim must meet the test of finality.
A civil contempt order is not a final judgment until the order is enforced. Niehoff v. Forney, 692 S.W.2d 635, 637 (Mo.App.1985). When confronted with a civil contempt order, a civil contemnor has two options. He may comply with the court's order, thereby purging himself of contempt; or he may decide to appeal, in which case he must wait until the court's order is enforced by actual incarceration pursuant to a warrant of commitment. Smith v. Smith, 676 S.W.2d 65, 66 (Mo.App.1984). If the contemnor chooses the first option, the case becomes moot and unappealable. Niehoff, 692 S.W.2d at 637. If he...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Marriage of Crow and Gilmore
...Watson v. Watson, 858 S.W.2d 841, 842 (Mo.App.1993); Houttuin v. Houttuin, 780 S.W.2d 711, 713 (Mo.App. 1989); City of Florissant v. Lee, 714 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Mo.App.1986); Niehoff v. Forney, 692 S.W.2d 635, 637 (Mo.App. 1985); Hamilton v. Hamilton, 661 S.W.2d 82, 83 (Mo.App.1983). But see ......
-
State ex rel. Imboden v. Romines
...determination turns on whether Imboden was held in civil or criminal contempt. Civil contempt is appealable, e.g. City of Florissant v. Lee, 714 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Mo.App.1986), and, thus, normally, is not reviewable by writ. Lewis v. Murray, 738 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Mo.App.1987). Criminal contem......
-
Marriage of Osborne, In re
...the trial court's order of May 17, 1994, sua sponte. Jefferson v. Bick, 840 S.W.2d 890, 891 (Mo.App.E.D.1992); City of Florissant v. Lee, 714 S.W.2d 871, 872-73 (Mo.App.E.D.1986). In Daniels v. Daniels, 748 S.W.2d 916 (Mo.App.W.D.1988), a child support obligor executed an assignment of inco......
-
Davis v. Allen
...question is raised by the parties. ABC Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. Clemans, 658 S.W.2d 28, 30 (Mo. banc 1983); City of Florissant v. Lee, 714 S.W.2d 871, 872-73 (Mo.App.1986). In order for an appeal to lie, there must be a final judgment or order. § 512.020. 1 City of Florissant v. Lee, supr......