City of Jacksonville v. Continental Can Co., Inc.
Citation | 151 So. 488,113 Fla. 168 |
Parties | CITY OF JACKSONVILLE et al. v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO., Inc. |
Decision Date | 06 December 1933 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Bill for injunction by the Continental Can Company, Inc., against the City of Jacksonville, a municipal corporation, and Alexander Ray, as Treasurer and Tax Collector of the City of Jacksonville, a municipal corporation. From a decree granting the injunction, defendants appeal.
Affirmed. Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; D. T Gray, Judge.
Austin Miller and Gov. Hutchinson, both of Jacksonville, for appellants.
Rogers & Towers, of Jacksonville, for appellee.
The controversy in this case involves the construction of section 12 of article 9 of the Constitution of 1885 (adopted in 1930) as applied to the manufacture in the city of Jacksonville of metal containers, which are made from steel and tin in the proportion of 98 1/2 per cent. steel and 1 1/2 per cent. tin by the Continental Can Company of that city.
The company began the manufacture of its product in the city of Jacksonville about the latter part of the year 1930 and paid all taxes assessed against its property for that year and preceding years. For the year 1931 the city assessed against certain real property of the company, described as tract No 1, the sum of $167.70, upon certain real estate described as tract No. 2 the sum of $553.80, and upon the personal property of the company located upon that tract the sum of $392.
The company paid the taxes assessed upon tract No. 1, but has not paid the taxes assessed against tract No. 2, nor the taxes assessed upon the personal property located on that tract. The two assessments of the latter properties amounts to the sum of $945.80.
The company, by appropriate proceedings, sought a restraining order against the city to prevent the collection by it of the taxes assessed upon tract No. 2 and the personal property located upon that tract, upon the ground that the properties were occupied and used by the company in the manufacture of steel vessels; that such vessels are manufactured as containers for fruits, vegetables, meats, and other food products in which such commodities are marketed; that the vessels consist of steel and tin in the proportion stated, and are often called 'tin cans'; that the real estate referred to as tract No. 2 is used as the location for the company's industrial plant consisting of buildings, warehouses, trackage, and other facilities, and the personal property on which the tax is levied is used upon the premises in and about the manufacture of the products of the company; and that section 12, article 9, of the Constitution, exempts such properties from all taxation for a period of fifteen years.
The city moved to dismiss the bill. The court denied the motion and granted the injunction as prayed for in the bill. The city took an appeal from the decree.
The clause in the Constitution which is involved in this case is as follows:
In the nature of the circumstances and conditions necessarily arising in the administration of the affairs of the government, those who are charged with official duties of any character must construe the Constitution and laws in numerous instances. Every department of government must, in the first instance at least, be the judge of its powers. Only in that class of cases which is addressed to the discretion of other departments may no occasion arise for judicial construction. In a case like this, however, the question, which involves a private as well as a public right, may be brought to the attention of the judiciary. The Constitution is to be interpreted and effect given to it as a paramount law and is equally obligatory upon individual citizens and all departments of government.
General principles governing the construction of statutes are applicable to the construction of Constitutions with some modifications. A Constitution is the framework of the government. It contains the general principles on which the government must function. Technical rules of construction therefore are not to be applied so as to defeat the principles of government or the object of its establishment. The fundamental purpose in construing a constitutional provision is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the framers and the people who adopted it. The object sought to be accomplished, therefore, must be kept constantly in view. The provisions of a written Constitution are presumed to have been more carefully and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. West v. Gray
...Constitution. Amos v. Mathews, 99 Fla. 1, 126 So. 308; Sullivan v. City of Tampa, 101 Fla. 298, 134 So. 211; City of Jacksonville v. Continental Can Co., 113 Fla. 168, 151 So. 488; State v. City of Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6; City of Tampa v. Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Co., 136 Fl......
-
Advisory Opinion (Chief Justice), In re, 85-471-M
...constitution, we are guided by the same rules of construction that apply to the construction of statutes. City of Jacksonville v. Continental Can Co., 113 Fla. 168, 151 So. 488 (1933). See also Opinion to the Governor, 44 R.I. 275, 117 A. 97 (1922). The general rule is that where a statute ......
-
State ex rel. West v. Gray
...Constitution. Amos v. Mathews, 99 Fla. 1, 126 So. 308; Sullivan v. City of Tampa, 101 Fla. 298, 134 So. 211; City of Jacksonville v. Continental Can Co., 113 Fla. 168, 151 So. 488; State v. City of Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6; City of Tampa v. Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Co., 136 Fl......
-
Apportionment Law Appearing as Senate Joint Resolution 1 E, 1982 Special Apportionment Session; Constitutionality Vel Non, In re
...consequently, must reject the position of the house. See Johnson v. McDonald, 269 So.2d 682 (Fla.1972); City of Jacksonville v. Continental Can Co., 113 Fla. 168, 151 So. 488 (1933). PART Objection to Geographic Separation of District 27. Certain residents in the eastern portion of house di......