City of Pembroke Pines v. Atlas, 84-631
Decision Date | 04 January 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 84-631,84-631 |
Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 139,474 So.2d 237 |
Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 139, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2122 CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES, Appellant, v. Bonnie ATLAS, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Gary M. Farmer of Gary M. Farmer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Steven L. Josias of Josias & Goren, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Philip Michael Cullen, III, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Appellant's contention that a plaintiff must allege compliance with the notice provision of section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1983) in order to vest the circuit court with subject matter jurisdiction of a tort suit against a municipality is without merit. This allegation is a condition precedent to suit, Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979), which must be pled to state a cause of action, but which may be waived by a defendant, City of Jacksonville Beach v. Duncan, 392 So.2d 25, 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), petition for review denied, 399 So.2d 1141 (Fla.1981); Hutchins v. Mills, 363 So.2d 818 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 1386 (Fla.1979). We hold that appellant waived the defect in the pleadings under the facts of this case.
Appellant, however, correctly asserts its right to jury trial on damages. Barge v. Simeton, 460 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Jayre, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 420 So.2d 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
We reverse and remand for jury trial upon the question of damages only.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellee's motion for rehearing is denied. State v. Green, 105 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958), cert. discharged, 112 So.2d 571 (Fla.1959). Although appellant's motion is also without merit, it has directed our attention to a matter which requires clarification of our earlier opinion.
Appellee failed to include in her complaint an allegation that she had complied with the notice provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes (1983). We held that appellant had waived that defect "under the facts of this case." Appellant suggests that this holding conflicts with Levine v. Dade County School Board, 442 So.2d 210 (Fla.1983), in which the Supreme Court held that the statute must be strictly construed. Levine, however, did not overrule Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979), in which the Supreme Court held that compliance with section 768.28(6) is a condition precedent to suit. The crucial "facts of this case" are that appellant, with knowledge of the claim and with knowledge of the suit, failed to raise the pleading defect until after entry of final judgment. The only defense available to appellant which survived the post-judgment motion proceedings was lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Rule 1.140(h), Fla.R.Civ.P.; see Atlas v. City of Pembroke Pines, 441 So.2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), petition for review denied, 450 So.2d 485 (Fla.1984). We hold that appellee's failure to allege compliance with the statutory notice provision did...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Gainesville v. STATE, DOT
...462 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Unless the state is estopped to raise the defense, see Bryant, 502 So.2d at 462; City of Pembroke Pines v. Atlas, 474 So.2d 237, 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the state may raise the plaintiff's failure to plead or prove facts showing sovereign immunity has been waived f......
-
City of Coconut Creek v. City of Deerfield Beach
...v. Hoffman, 589 So.2d 223, 224 (Fla.1991); Menendez v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist., 537 So.2d 89, 91 (Fla.1988); City of Pembroke Pines v. Atlas, 474 So.2d 237, 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Prestige Dev. Group, Inc. v. Russell, 612 So.2d 691, 692 (Fla. 1st DCA In summary, Coconut Creek's consistency......
-
Solimando v. International Medical Centers, H.M.O.
...ex rel. Manatee County v. Kruysman, 475 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 486 So.2d 598 (Fla.1986); City of Pembroke Pines v. Atlas, 474 So.2d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 486 So.2d 595 (Fla.1986). In Kruysman, this court stated that "[w]hile a claimant must allege compli......
-
Metropolitan Dade County v. Coats
...475 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), review denied, 486 So.2d 598 (Fla.1986) (interpreting section 768.28(6)); City of Pembroke Pines v. Atlas, 474 So.2d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), review denied, 486 So.2d 595 (Fla.1986) (on motion for rehearing) (interpreting section 768.28(6)); see generally ......