City of Seattle v. MacDonald
Decision Date | 10 October 1907 |
Citation | 91 P. 952,47 Wash. 298 |
Parties | CITY OF SEATTLE v. MacDONALD. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; A. W. Frater, Judge.
Ray MacDonald was convicted by the police judge of the city of Seattle of violating an ordinance against gaming, and appealed to the superior court. From a judgment of the latter court quashing the conviction, the city appeals. Reversed.
Ellis De Bruler, for appellant.
Morris Southard & Shipley, for respondent.
On November 17, 1899, the city of Seattle passed an ordinance relating to misdemeanors, section 10 of which reads as follows: 'Whoever deals, plays at, wagers anything of value on, or in any manner takes part in, or whoever carries on or causes to be opened, or who conducts, sets up, keeps or exhibits any game of faro, monte, roulette, lans-quenette rouge et noir, rondo, poker, draw-poker, keno or E. O. or roulette table or shuffle board, or fantan, or any gaming table or game whatever, for the purpose of gambling or any game of chance for the purpose of winning or securing money by chance, played with cards, dice or any device whatever kind or nature, whether or not of the kind, character or nature herein mentioned, for money, checks, credit or any representative of value whatever, or whoever shall have in his possession to be used for the purpose of gambling or winning money by chance any gaming device whatever, shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment not exceeding six months or by both.' On March 7, 1903, the Legislature made it felony to maintain a gambling resort; the act consisting of one section, which reads as follows: Laws 1903, p. 63, c. 51. On October 17, 1906, one W. I. Peer made complaint before the police judge of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Bellingham v. Schampera
...intoxicating liquor); Allen v. City of Bellingham, 1917, 95 Wash. 12, 163 P. 18 (regulating jitney busses); Seattle v. MacDonald, 1907, 47 Wash. 298, 91 P. 952, 17 L.R.A.,N.S., 49 (prohibiting gambling); Bellingham v. Cissna, 1906, 44 Wash. 397, 87 P. 481 (regulating speed of automobiles); ......
-
Salt Lake City v. Doran
...A city may punish as a misdemeanor an offense which a state punishes as a felony (People v. Tanrahan, 4 L. R. A. (Mich.) 757; Seattle v. McDonald, 91 P. 952 (Wash.) McQuillen on Municipal Corporations, secs. 877, 878; Dillon on Municipal Corporations (5 Ed.), secs. 632 and 63; Cooley on Con......
-
State v. Tucker
... ... in the police court of the city of Everett with the ... possession of intoxicating liquor, being the exact liquor ... which are also punishable under the state law. Seattle v ... Chin Let, 19 Wash. 38, 52 P. 324; Seattle v ... MacDonald, 47 Wash. 298, 91 P ... ...
-
Mitsch v. City of Hammond, 29173
...effect of the condemning statute, § 9-2402, Burns' 1942 Repl., supra. See interesting annotation in City of Seattle v. MacDonald, 1907, 47 Wash. 298, 91 P. 952, 17 L.R.A.,N.S., 49. Our Motor Vehicles Law among other things, provides as 'The provisions of this act shall be applicable and uni......