City of St. Joseph v. Roller
| Decision Date | 14 January 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 2,No. 49273,49273,2 |
| Citation | 363 S.W.2d 609 |
| Parties | CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, Missouri, Appellant, v. L. J. ROLLER, Respondent |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Joseph G. Wood, City Counselor for City of St. Joseph.
Ronald S. Reed, Reed & Reed, St. Joseph, for Zola Anderson et al., amicus curiae.
Kranitz & Kranitz, St. Joseph, for respondent.
This proceeding involves the constitutionality of an ordinance of the City of St. Joseph, Missouri. It was commenced in the Police Court of St. Joseph by an information filed by the City Counselor against the defendant charging a violation of a city ordinance. The Police Court dismissed the information and the City appealed to the Circuit Court of Buchanan County where the defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the ground, among others, that the ordinance and the statute on which it was based were unconstitutional. The persons who appear here as amici curiae also by leave filed a brief in the Circuit Court.
The transcript recites: 'No evidence was offered or received on the Motion to Dismiss, and specifically Section 12-315 Municipal Code of the City of St. Joseph, 1949, as amended by General Ordinance 3179, enacted October 14, 1950, was neither offered nor received in evidence.' Nevertheless, the motion to dismiss was argued orally, written briefs were filed, and thereafter the court sustained the defendant's motion to dismiss. In connection with making the record entry of dismissal, the court dictated into the record a memorandum of the grounds of his ruling. The City's motion for new trial was overruled and it appealed.
Since neither the ordinance nor any other evidence was introduced at the hearing of the motion to dismiss, the extent of the record before the trial court as well as this court will be apparent by reference to the pleadings. The information reads as follows:
'The undersigned city counselor for the City of St. Joseph, aforesaid, informs said court that the City of St. Joseph is a municipal corporation and a city of the first class, and that the above named defendant did, on or about the 12th day of August, 1961, and on divers other days within a year period thereto, violate an ordinance of said city, to-wit: Section 12-12, Chapter 315, Municipal Code of the City of Saint Joseph, Missouri, 1949 (or General or Special Ordinance Number . . ..) as amended, by then and there in said City of St. Joseph, Missouri, Violation city code Barber Law 12-12-315, at 7110 King Hill, 7:04 A.M. to the damage of said city in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars.'
The grounds alleged in defendant's motion to dismiss are:
'1. That Sec. 12-315 of the Municipal Code of the City of St. Joseph (Go 3179, 14 October 1950) is so vague, indefinite and uncertain as to be wholly invalid as a penal regulation.
'2. That said Sec. 12-315 is beyond the scope of the powers granted plaintiff under Sec. 71.750, RSMo 1959, and hence is ultra vires.
'3. That said Sec. 12-315 of the Code and Sec. 71.750 of the Statutes are class legislation, discriminatory in nature, deprive defendant of his property without due process of law, and hence are violative of Article I of the Constitution of Missouri of 1945, and of the Fourteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
At the time the record entry of dismissal was made, the court dictated the following 'MEMORANDUM OF COURT' into the record:
'The Court feels after reading the briefs and learing the arguments of Counsel, that the statute upon which this ordinance is based, has no substantial or rational relation to the police powers of the State and does not simply regulate the hours of labor, but regulates the time of opening and closing shops.
'Further, if it is for the purpose of regulating competition, it is class legislation.
'WHEREFORE, the Motion to Dismiss is by the Court sustained on the grounds that the statute upon which the ordinance is based is unconstitutional.'
Jurisdiction of the appeal is in this court because the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance and the statute on which it is alleged to be based were presented by the motion to dismiss, and the trial court held the statute to be unconstitutional. Art. V, Sec. 3, Constitution of Missouri, 1945, V.A.M.S.; Marshall v. Kansas City Mo., 355 S.W.2d 877, 879; Wooster v. Trimont Mfg. Co., 356 Mo. 682, 203 S.W.2d 411.
In their briefs both parties have gone outside of the record. The defendant in particular undertakes to explain his factual situation and inserts in his statement of facts what purports to be a copy of the ordinance pursuant to which the defendant was arrested. To this, the City properly objects in its reply brief. The parties have briefed the constitutional questions and the extent of the police powers of the state, but on the record before us we cannot reach and decide these issues.
Essentially, the situation in this case is the same as in City of Rolla v. Riden, Mo.App., 349 S.W.2d 255. The defendant Riden was charged with violating a city ordinance described by number, in that he sold milk in the City of Rolla without a permit. A jury found Riden not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Americans United v. Rogers
...be properly decided without doing so. McIntosh v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., Mo., 366 S.W.2d 409, 412(2); City of St. Joseph v. Roller, Mo., 363 S.W.2d 609, 612(6); Rider v. Julian, 365 Mo. 313, 282 S.W.2d 484, The court said that the two subsections under attack in Chamberlin were ......
-
Consumer Contact Co. v. State, Dept. of Revenue
...Division, etc., 574 S.W.2d 394, 400 (Mo.banc 1978); Playboy Club, Inc. v. Myers, 431 S.W.2d 228, 230 (Mo.1968); City of St. Joseph v. Roller, 363 S.W.2d 609, 611 (Mo.1963); Queen of Diamonds, Inc. v. Quinn, 569 S.W.2d 317, 319 (Mo.App.1978); City of Rolla v. Riden, 349 S.W.2d 255, 258 (Mo.A......
-
United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
...not necessary to a decision of the case. State ex rel. State Board of Mediation v. Pigg, 362 Mo. 798, 244 S.W.2d 75; City of St. Joseph v. Roller, Mo., 363 S.W.2d 609; Rider v. Julian, 365 Mo. 313, 282 S.W.2d 484. And no one contends, for instance, that an assessment on the basis now direct......
-
Chamberlin v. Missouri Elections Commission
...be properly decided without doing so. McIntosh v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., Mo., 366 S.W.2d 409, 412(2); City of St. Joseph v. Roller, Mo., 363 S.W.2d 609, 612(6); Rider v. Julian, 365 Mo. 313, 282 S.W.2d 484, We conclude that subsections 1(5) and 1(6) are fairly susceptible of a c......