City of West Palm Beach v. Chisolm
| Decision Date | 29 October 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. YY-244,YY-244 |
| Citation | 405 So.2d 279 |
| Parties | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, Appellant, v. Ben CHISOLM, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
William P. Doney, Asst. City Atty., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Thomas A. Hoadley, of Hoadley & Gavigan, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
In this workers' compensation case, the employer appeals a modification order entered by the deputy commissioner which ordered employer to pay for an orthopedic evaluation of claimant and which ordered the employer to pay certain medical bills related to claimant's hemorrhoidectomy performed June 19, 1980, based upon the deputy's finding that claimant had suffered a change in condition. We reverse.
Except as to the extent that modification is permitted by Section 440.28, Florida Statutes (1978), deputies' orders are governed by the principles of res judicata or estoppel. Power v. Joseph G. Moretti, Inc., 120 So.2d 443 (Fla.1960). It is well-settled that the modification procedures set forth in Section 440.28 were not intended as affording a claimant an opportunity to relitigate an identical issue which had been previously determined, based solely upon an increase in the quantum and probative force of evidence in support of a conclusion contrary to that reached by prior determination. Hall v. Seaboard Maritime Corporation, 104 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). Thus, the introduction of cumulative evidence which does nothing more than add to or controvert evidence already taken is insufficient to support a modification. Sonny Boy's Fruit Company v. Compton, 46 So.2d 17 (Fla.1950).
A review of the record herein reveals that claimant failed to meet his burden to establish proper grounds for modification of the prior order. Although the evidence reveals that claimant's hemorrhoid condition had worsened since the entry of the previous order, the record also reveals that the issue of the compensability of claimant's present hemorrhoid condition was litigated in the prior hearings and was determined adversely to the claimant. Claimant may not now attempt to relitigate the issue of causal connection by the introduction of testimony which is merely more favorable to claimant than that initially presented and which should have been presented initially.
Similarly, we find that the requirement of payment by the employer for an orthopedic evaluation of claimant was erroneous. It appears that the compensability of claimant's back condition...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Massie v. University of Florida, BN-98
...209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); McKenney v. School Board of Palm Beach County, 408 So.2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); City of West Palm Beach v. Chisolm, 405 So.2d 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Heter v. Buning The Florist, 396 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); City of Vero Beach v. Thomas, 388 So.2d 1374 (Fl......
-
Flesche v. Interstate Warehouse, AD-327
...as in Florida Division of Corrections v. Morgan, 397 So.2d 1026 (Fla.1981), and cases therein cited, and City of West Palm Beach v. Chisolm, 405 So.2d 279 (Fla.App.1981). We are convinced that a "sink-or-swim" approach to the job search requirement has not and will not serve the interests o......
-
Pitts v. Nimnicht Chevrolet, 89-1455
...443, 446 (Fla.1960); McKenney v. School Board of Palm Beach County, 408 So.2d 655, 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); City of West Palm Beach v. Chisolm, 405 So.2d 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). However, the issue in this case is the propriety of the determination that claimant's September 3, 1987, letter ......
-
University Inns v. Davis
...proceedings are not intended to permit a claimant to relitigate issues which have been previously determined. City of West Palm Beach v. Chisolm, 405 So.2d 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Universal Erectors, Inc. v. Murphy, 410 So.2d 209 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1982). Evidence which merely supplements or c......