Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
CitationCleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 264 N.Y. 568 (N.Y. 1934)
Decision Date17 April 1934
PartiesCleveland v. Town of Lancaster

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal, by permission, from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department (239 App. Div. 263, 267 N. Y. S. 673), entered November 17, 1933, and December 7, 1933, respectively, unanimously affirming judgments in favor of the defendants town of Lancaster and town of Cheektowaga, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff's intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the failure of the defendant towns to keep a traffic light on the boundary line between them in proper repair and through the negligence of the defendant Hill in driving his car, in which intestate was a passenger, so as to collide with another, as the result of which the intestate received injuries causing his death. The trial judge held that the towns in erecting and maintaining the traffic light were exercising a governmental function.

James O. Moore, of Buffalo, for appellant.

Levant D. Lester, of Lancaster, for resp...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Bady v. Detwiler
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 10, 1954
    ...289 N.Y.S. 198, affirmed 273 N.Y. 547, 7 N.E.2d 685; Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 App.Div. 263, 267 N.Y.S. 673, affirmed 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568; Parson v. Texas City, Tex.Civ.App., 259 S.W.2d 333; Burchett v. City of Stanton, Tex.Civ.App., 262 S.W.2d 952; Presley v. City of Odess......
  • Hodges v. City of Charlotte
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1939
    ...police in the exercise of which the city is not liable". In Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 A.D. 263, 267 N.Y.S. 673, affirmed 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568, it is [page 676]: "The town boards were also authorized by statute to enact ordinances, rules, and regulations relating to peace and......
  • Doremus v. Incorporated Village of Lynbrook
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 4, 1966
    ...229 N.Y. 161, 128 N.E. 119, 24 A.L.R. 763, cf. Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 App.Div. 263, 266, 267 N.Y.S. 673, 676, affd. 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568; 40 C.J.S. Highways § 254, subd. b). There can be little doubt that a failure to maintain a proper warning sign renders a highway defec......
  • Moore v. City of Yonkers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 19, 1958
    ...of language which clearly imports that intention (Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 App.Div. 263, 267 N.Y.S. 673, affirmed 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568; People v. Dethloff, 283 N.Y. 309, 28 N.E.2d 850; People v. Phyfe, 136 N.Y. 554, 32 N.E. 978, 19 L.R.A. 141). There is no such language in ......
  • Get Started for Free