Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster

Decision Date17 April 1934
Citation264 N.Y. 568,191 N.E. 568
PartiesMinnie F. CLEVELAND, as Administratrix of the Estate of C. Lewis Cleveland, Deceased, Appellant, v. TOWN OF LANCASTER et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal, by permission, from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department (239 App. Div. 263, 267 N. Y. S. 673), entered November 17, 1933, and December 7, 1933, respectively, unanimously affirming judgments in favor of the defendants town of Lancaster and town of Cheektowaga, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff's intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the failure of the defendant towns to keep a traffic light on the boundary line between them in proper repair and through the negligence of the defendant Hill in driving his car, in which intestate was a passenger, so as to collide with another, as the result of which the intestate received injuries causing his death. The trial judge held that the towns in erecting and maintaining the traffic light were exercising a governmental function.

James O. Moore, of Buffalo, for appellant.

Levant D. Lester, of Lancaster, for respondent Town of Lancaster.

Carlton A. Fisher, of Buffalo, for respondent Town of Cheektowaga.

PER CURIAM.

Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

POUND, C. J., and CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, and CROUCH, JJ., concur.

KELLOGG, J., not sitting.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Bady v. Detwiler
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • September 10, 1954
    ...289 N.Y.S. 198, affirmed 273 N.Y. 547, 7 N.E.2d 685; Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 App.Div. 263, 267 N.Y.S. 673, affirmed 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568; Parson v. Texas City, Tex.Civ.App., 259 S.W.2d 333; Burchett v. City of Stanton, Tex.Civ.App., 262 S.W.2d 952; Presley v. City of Odess......
  • Hodges v. City of Charlotte
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1939
    ...police in the exercise of which the city is not liable". In Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 A.D. 263, 267 N.Y.S. 673, affirmed 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568, it is [page 676]: "The town boards were also authorized by statute to enact ordinances, rules, and regulations relating to peace and......
  • Doremus v. Incorporated Village of Lynbrook
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 4, 1966
    ...229 N.Y. 161, 128 N.E. 119, 24 A.L.R. 763, cf. Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 App.Div. 263, 266, 267 N.Y.S. 673, 676, affd. 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568; 40 C.J.S. Highways § 254, subd. b). There can be little doubt that a failure to maintain a proper warning sign renders a highway defec......
  • Moore v. City of Yonkers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 19, 1958
    ...of language which clearly imports that intention (Cleveland v. Town of Lancaster, 239 App.Div. 263, 267 N.Y.S. 673, affirmed 264 N.Y. 568, 191 N.E. 568; People v. Dethloff, 283 N.Y. 309, 28 N.E.2d 850; People v. Phyfe, 136 N.Y. 554, 32 N.E. 978, 19 L.R.A. 141). There is no such language in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT