Cochran v. State, 55719

Decision Date23 June 1978
Docket NumberNo. 55719,55719
PartiesCOCHRAN v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Gaines C. Granade, Atlanta, for appellant.

Robert E. Keller, Dist. Atty., Clifford A. Sticher, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

BIRDSONG, Judge.

Cochran was indicted for murder and convicted, by a jury, of voluntary manslaughter. He appeals, enumerating two errors. Held:

1. Appellant's first enumeration of error raises the general grounds. "As to the general grounds, this court is bound by the 'any evidence' rule and must accept the state's version of the evidence, as was done by the jury and the trial judge." Franklin v. State, 136 Ga.App. 47, 48(1), 220 S.E.2d 60, 62. The evidence presented showed that appellant and his son drove to deceased's residence where appellant intended to repossess an automobile for which deceased was indebted to him. The two thereafter consumed deceased's beer, and an argument developed over the quantity of beer consumed by appellant and who should purchase additional beer. Deceased and appellant also argued over an alleged indebtedness not related to the automobile. Deceased then struggled with appellant's son for possession of a 20-gauge shotgun, ultimately wresting it from the boy and commanding appellant: "Shut up or I'll shoot you." Immediately thereafter, appellant shot and killed deceased with a blast from a 12-gauge shotgun. Appellant's conviction of voluntary manslaughter was supported by the evidence. See Curtis v. State, 141 Ga.App. 36, 232 S.E.2d 382; Robertson v. State, 140 Ga.App. 506, 231 S.E.2d 367; Fuller v. State, 138 Ga.App. 241, 225 S.E.2d 718 2. " 'Whenever a homicide is neither justifiable nor malicious, it is manslaughter, and, if intentional, is voluntary manslaughter.' (Cits.) In the present case, if the homicide was neither accidental nor malicious it was intentional, and therefore was voluntary manslaughter." Gainey v. State, 132 Ga.App. 870(1), 209 S.E.2d 687. " '(I)f there be any evidence, however slight, as to whether the offense is murder or manslaughter, instructions as to both should be given to the jury . . . and the jury's province was to decide as to whether the offense be murder or manslaughter.' (Cits.)" Curtis v. State, 141 Ga.App. 36, 38, 232 S.E.2d 382, supra. See Gresham v. State, 216 Ga. 106(2), 115 S.E.2d 191; Banks v. State, 127 Ga.App. 14, 192 S.E.2d 414; Stuart v. State, 123 Ga.App. 311(3), 180 S.E.2d 581. The trial...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Lightsey v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 d1 Setembro d1 1981
    ...and therefore was voluntary manslaughter.' " Ballard v. State, 150 Ga.App. 704 (2), 258 S.E.2d 331; Accord: Cochran v. State, 146 Ga.App. 414, 415, 246 S.E.2d 431; Ward v. State, 151 Ga.App. 36, 258 S.E.2d 699. The sufficiency of the provocation and cooling time are questions for the jury. ......
  • Ballard v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 12 d4 Julho d4 1979
    ...was neither accidental nor malicious it was intentional, and therefore was voluntary manslaughter.' (Cit.)" Cochran v. State, 146 Ga.App. 414, 415(2), 246 S.E.2d 431, 432(2) (1978). 3. Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 647, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 2258-2259, 49 L.Ed.2d 108, supra, was "unique becau......
  • Spradlin v. State, 57964
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 2 d2 Outubro d2 1979
    ...an offense is murder or manslaughter, however slight, the court should instruct as to both when requested in writing. Cochran v. State, 146 Ga.App. 414(2), 246 S.E.2d 431; Gresham v. State, 216 Ga. 106(2), 115 S.E.2d 191; Parker v. State, 218 Ga. 654(5), 129 S.E.2d 850. We are aware that th......
  • Bailey v. State, 57614
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 5 d2 Junho d2 1979
    ...sufficient to support the verdict as to all three offenses. See Toole v. State, 146 Ga.App. 305(1), 246 S.E.2d 338; Cochran v. State, 146 Ga.App. 414(1), 246 S.E.2d 431. Despite the affidavits attached to the amended motion for new trial based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT