Robertson v. State

Decision Date26 October 1976
Docket NumberNo. 1,No. 52943,52943,1
PartiesRilla C. ROBERTSON v. The STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Stanley H. Nylen, Atlanta, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Joseph J. Drolet, H. Allen Moye, Harvey W. Moskowitz, Asst. Dist. Attys., Atlanta, for appellee.

BELL, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The state's evidence showed that defendant and her husband were engaged in an argument and that she shot and killed him.

Defendant testified that when she was going to bed her husband started to push and beat her. She managed to escape to the bedroom and told him not to come in because she was out of breath, having had open heart surgery about 7 months prior. However, he opened the unlocked door and she saw a shotgun in his hand. She reached for a pistol and shot him because she feared for her life. She had not intended to kill him, only to scare him. Held:

1. Defendant urges that the trial court erred in failing to charge on the lesser included offense of involuntary manslaughter. We find no error for that offense was not reasonably raised by the evidence. If the defendant did not actually intend to kill her husband, she either committed an aggravated assault, a felony under Code § 26-1302, or she acted in self-defense which would show no offense. Thus she was not engaged in the commission of an unlawful act other than a felony and she was not engaged in the commission of a lawful act in an unlawful manner, the essential ingredients of involuntary manslaughter. Code § 26-1103. Tate v. State, 123 Ga.App. 18, 19(2), 179 S.E.2d 307. The trial judge, as was agreed to by both counsel at trial, correctly viewed the case as one limited to murder, voluntary manslaughter, or an excusable death.

2. Defendant complains that the court erred without request in failing to charge the jury that no one is presumed to act with criminal intent as codified in Code § 26-605. This failure to charge without request was not error in view of the entire charge that was given. Geer v. State, 184 Ga. 805, 193 S.E. 776.

Judgment affirmed.

CLARK and STOLZ, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Crawford v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • January 24, 1980
    ...chair. It was held to be error to fail to charge on request lawful act-unlawful manner-involuntary manslaughter. In Robertson v. State, 140 Ga.App. 506, 231 S.E.2d 367 (1976), the homicide was committed with a pistol; the deceased had a shotgun. It was held not to be error to fail to charge......
  • Cochran v. State, 55719
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 23, 1978
    ...of voluntary manslaughter was supported by the evidence. See Curtis v. State, 141 Ga.App. 36, 232 S.E.2d 382; Robertson v. State, 140 Ga.App. 506, 231 S.E.2d 367; Fuller v. State, 138 Ga.App. 241, 225 S.E.2d 2. " 'Whenever a homicide is neither justifiable nor malicious, it is manslaughter,......
  • Buckner v. State, 32734
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 19, 1977
    ...comply with local court rules, the offense of involuntary manslaughter was not reasonably raised by the evidence. Robertson v. State, 140 Ga.App. 506, 231 S.E.2d 367 (1976). The defendant's testimony might support a finding that the killing was justifiable or in self-defense, but it sets fo......
  • Williams v. State, 52860
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 26, 1976

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT