Coe-mortimer Co. v. State

Decision Date13 May 1921
Citation88 So. 475,81 Fla. 701
PartiesCOE-MORTIMER CO. v. STATE.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Original proceedings in certiorari by the Coe-Mortimer Company, a corporation, to review a conviction of the corporation for a statutory offense, rendered by the county court and affirmed by the circuit court.

Conviction quashed.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

Certiorari is not a writ of right. A writ of certiorari is not a writ of right.

When affirmance below will be quashed on certiorari stated. If upon an inspection of the transcript of the record sent up under a writ of certiorari issued by this court it appears that the county court was without jurisdiction of the subjectmatter or of the defendant, or that the charge as made constitutes no offense under the law, either because of the invalidity of the statute or because of the absence of essential allegations, or that the judgment or other proceeding of record had on the charge is not in accordance with the essential requirements of the law, the judgment of affirmance by the circuit court will be quashed; otherwise the writ of certiorari will be quashed.

Statutory offense must clearly appear by information or necessary inference. In a penal proceeding the offense made punishable by the statute must clearly appear by the allegations of the information or by necessary inference from express allegations.

Misrepresentations on tag on commercial fertilizer a statutory offense. The misrepresentation, made an offense by section 3726, Gen. St 1906 (section 5711, Rev. Gen. St. 1920), is that which is made in connection with a sale of the commercial fertilizers referred to in the statute, which misrepresentation appears on the 'label or tag' that is required to be attached to the package containing the commercial fertilizer that is sold.

When relief by certiorari appropriate stated. Where an information in a criminal prosecution does not contain essential allegations to state the offense, and the defect is fatal, it cannot be cured by evidence; and relief by certiorari may be appropriate, in the absence of appellate procedure, where the penalty is a fine against a corporation; the writ of habeas corpus not being available as in case of illegal deprivation of personal liberty.

COUNSEL

Landis, Fish & Hull and Fred R. Wilson, all of De Land, for petitioner.

Van C Swearingen, Atty. Gen., and D. Stuart Gillis and J. B. Gaines, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.

OPINION

WHITFIELD J.

A writ of certiorari was issued by this court for the purpose of determining on a certified transcript of the record whether the essential requirements of the law were duly observed in the affirmance by the circuit court of a judgment of the county court of St. Lucie county, convicting the corporation of a statutory offense and imposing a fine as punishment.

A writ of certiorari is not a writ of right. Holmberg v. Toomer, 78 Fla. 116, 82 So. 620; Harrison v. Frink, 75 Fla. 22, 77 So. 663; Benton v. State, 74 Fla. 30, 76 So. 341; Ragland v. State, 55 Fla. 157, 46 So. 724; Edgerton v. Mayor, etc., of Green Cove Springs, 18 Fla. 528.

In this case the court exercised its discretion, and issued a writ of certiorari upon the showing made in the application for the writ.

If upon an inspection of the transcript of the record it appears that the trial court was without jurisdiction of the subject-matter or of the defendant, or that the charge as made constitutes no offense under the law, either because of the invalidity of the statute or because of the absence of essential allegations, or that the judgment or other proceeding of record had on the charge is not in accordance with the essential requirements of the law, the judgment of affirmance will be quashed; otherwise the writ of certiorari will be quashed. First Nat. Bank of Gainesville v. Gibbs, 78 Fla. 118, 82 So. 618; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Wright & Co., 79 Fla. 600, 84 So. 604; Balbontin v. State, 68 Fla. 84, 66 So. 421; Malone v. City of Quincy, 66 Fla. 52, 62 So. 922; State v. Live Oak, P. & G. R. Co., 70 Fla. 564, 70 So. 550; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Ray, 52 Fla. 634, 42 So. 714; Jacksonville, T. & K. Ry. C. v. Boy, 34 Fla. 389, 16 So. 290; Mernaugh v. City of Orlando, 41 Fla. 433, 27 So. 34; Basnet v. City of Jacksonville, 18 Fla. 523.

The statutes provide that:

'Every bag, barrel, or other package of commercial fertilizers, cotton seed meal, castor pomace, tobacco stems, tobacco dust, or tobacco meal manufactured, sold in or imported into this state, shall have securely attached a label or tag, and plainly stamped thereon the number of net pounds of fertilizer in the package, the name, brand or trade-mark under which the fertilizer is sold, the name and address of the manufacturer and the chemical analysis stating the minimum percentage of ammonia and the source from which the same is derived, the minimum percentage of potash soluble in water, the minimum percentage of available phosphoric acid, and the minimum percentage of insoluble phosphoric acid, the maximum percentage of moisture contained
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Gibbs v. Mayo
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 20, 1955
    ...it is not necessarily to be inferred that the fertilizers were in fact sold to the consignee.' (Emphasis supplied.) Coe-Mortimer Co. v. State, 81 Fla. 701, 88 So, 475, 476. Nor does proof of breaking and entering a gin house sustain a charge of breaking and entering a storehouse. Givens v. ......
  • Lorenzo v. Murphy
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • November 7, 1947
    ... ... The demurrer above ... referred to came on to be heard before the County Court and ... the said Judge proceeded to state that in view of the ... allegation that these parties had not complied with the ... Fictitious Name Statute, Section 865.09, that he would ... Bank v. Gibbs, 78 Fla. 118, ... 82 So. 618; Western Union Tel. Co. v. O. H. Wright & Co., ... 79 Fla. 600, 84 So. 604; Coe-Mortimer Co. v. State, ... 81 Fla. 701, 88 So. 475. And that: ... '* * * A ... careful reading of the review of the English authorities made ... by ... ...
  • Dresner v. City of Tallahassee
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1964
    ...was also formerly the rule if the conviction in the lower trial court was the product of an unconstitutional statute. Coe-Mortimer Co. v. State, 81 Fla. 701, 88 So. 475; Porter v. State, 91 Fla. 667, 108 So. 814. Similarly it has been held that the imposition of a penalty for activities not......
  • Dowling v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 28, 1929
    ... ... inferior court has exceeded its jurisdiction, or has not ... proceeded according to the essential requirements of the law, ... in cases where no direct appellate proceedings are provided ... In the ... case of Coe-Mortimer Co. v. State, 81 Fla. 701, 88 ... So. 475, the court held that if upon an inspection of the ... record sent up under a writ of certiorari it appears that the ... trial court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter or of ... the defendant, 'or that the charge as made constitutes no ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT