Coffey v. Anderson
| Decision Date | 11 October 1963 |
| Citation | 371 S.W.2d 624 |
| Parties | Claude COFFEY et al., Petitioners v. S. E. ANDERSON, Judge of Wayne County Court, Respondent. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
Charles C. Adams, Adams & Adams, Somerset, for petitioners.
J. C. Denney, Jr., County Atty., Randall Bertram, Monticello, for respondent.
Twenty-nine signers claiming to aggregate a majority of the 'duly registered' voters living in a portion of Wayne County lying north of Lake Cumberland filed a petition in the Wayne County Court asking for an election on the proposition of striking the area from Wayne County and attaching it to the adjoining county of Pulaski. Const. § 65; KRS 67.030. The petition was dismissed on the ground it was not signed by the requisite number of voters. This is an original action for mandamus against the Judge of the Wayne County Court to enforce compliance with the demand of the petition. Cf. CR 81; RCA 1.420.
KRS 67.030 does not prescribe any method or procedure for determining whether the signers of a petition filed thereunder do in fact constitute a majority of the voters living in the territory sought to be transferred. In such a case the county judge must proceed ex parte to determine the sufficiency of the petition on its face and, if he deems it necessary, satisfy himself that the signatures and petitioners are what and who they purport to be and constitute the required percentage of voters. Skaggs v. Fyffe, 266 Ky. 337, 98 S.W.2d 884, 889 (1936); Stieritz v. Kaufman, 314 Ky. 10, 234 S.W.2d 145 (1950). If he is in error in declining to direct the election, this court has jurisdiction under Const. § 110 to correct his action. Franklin v. Pursiful, 295 Ky. 222, 173 S.W.2d 131, 133 (1943); Bays v. Bradley Mills, Ky., 254 S.W.2d 348 (1943). However, in view of Hettich v. Colson, Ky., 366 S.W.2d 907 (1963), and Cunnigan v. Jones, Ky., 371 S.W.2d 624, decided today, the circuit court also has jurisdiction to provide adequate relief. Therefore, under similar circumstances this court henceforth will not exercise original jurisdiction.
The records of the Wayne County Court Clerk showed 62 registered voters in the area, but petitioners contend that several of these persons did not reside there and that the actual number of voters was 52. The order dismissing the petition recites that five of the 29 petitioners had requested in writing that their names be withdrawn, and concludes that the petition 'did not contain a majority of the qualified voters in the * * * area sough to be stricken from Wayne County,' etc. To the extent this conclusion was based on the attempted withdrawal of some of the petitioners it was, of course, in error, because such a withdrawal is unauthorized and ineffective. Evans v. Maddox, Ky., 260 S.W.2d 661 (1953).
The word 'voters' appears never to have been construed by this court with direct reference to Const. § 65 and KRS 67.030. In other connections it has been held ordinarily to mean persons having the qualifications set out in Const. § 145, whether registered or not. Meffert v. Brown, 132 Ky. 201, 116 S.W. 779 (1909); City of Covington v. Miller, 266 Ky. 198, 98 S.W.2d 293 (1936); Branstetter v. Heater, 269 Ky. 844, 108 S.W.2d 1040 (1937); Stieritz v. Kaufman, 314 Ky. 10, 234 S.W.2d 145 (1950). See, however, Hall v. Reid, Ky., 305 S.W.2d 923 (1957), in which a different result was reached under KRS 118.080.
Under the cases holding that one who has the right to register but has not done so is nevertheless a 'voter,' it would be incumbent on the petitioners in a case such as this to seek out and establish the number of persons in the area who, in addition to those already registered, were not registered but had the right to register. Being of the opinion that in many instances this would be impracticable and an unreasonable burden, we have reconsidered the question of proper definition and have concluded that registration is one of the essential qualifications of a 'voter.' To the extent that the Meffert, City of Covington,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Metzger v. Summe, 2012-CA-001622-MR
...Franklin v. Pursiful, 295 Ky. 222, 173 S.W.2d 131, 133 (1943); Bays v. Bradley Mills, Ky., 254 S.W.2d 348 (1943). Coffey v. Anderson, 371 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Ky. 1963). 9. There are allegations of fraud in the petition. Two affidavits were submitted of physicians stating that their purported s......
-
Fisher v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., s. 11206
...664; Neptune City v. Avon-By-The-Sea, 61 N.J. 296, 294 A.2d 47; Hughes v. City of Woodward, 1969, Okl., 457 P.2d 787; and Coffey v. Anderson, 1963, Ky., 371 S.W.2d 624. We refute any proposition that prospectivity is necessarily limited only to situations involved in the 'overruling' of pre......
-
Oxford Consumer Discount Co. of North Philadelphia v. Stefanelli, A--469
...See Goldberg v. Traver, Supra (52 N.J., at pp. 346--347, 245 A.2d 334); Irwin v. Irwin, Supra (433 P.2d, at p. 934); Coffey v. Anderson, 371 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Ky.Ct.App.1963); Nani v. Zoning Board of Review of Town of Smithfield, 242 A.2d 403 (R.I.Sup.Ct.1968). It is note-worthy that in all ......
-
Com. v. Kash
...between registration and voting, with registration facilitating the integrity of the voting and election process. In Coffey v. Anderson, Ky., 371 S.W.2d 624, 626 (1963), the Court stated that Section 145 of the Kentucky Constitution must be read in pari materia with Section 147 to determine......