Coffman v. Goree Independent School Dist.

Decision Date14 October 1911
PartiesCOFFMAN et al. v. GOREE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. et al.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Appeal from District Court, Knox County; Jo. A. P. Dickson, Judge.

Action by E. M. Coffman and others against the Goree Independent School District and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

B. D. Glasgow, Coombes & Coombes, and Jas. A. Stephens, for appellants. D. J. Brookreson, for appellees.

CONNER, C. J.

This appeal is from a judgment upon demurrer dismissing the petition of E. M. Coffman and others against the Goree independent school district seeking to restrain a threatened levy and collection of taxes upon the property of the petitioners.

No briefs have been filed, but the case was submitted upon an oral suggestion of fundamental error. It would perhaps be sufficient to say that an examination of the record has disclosed no such error and to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, but we have concluded to briefly notice the case and to affirm the judgment rather than to dismiss the appeal.

The petition avers the incorporation of the Goree independent school district and the election of the individual trustees named in the petition as school trustees, but alleges as grounds for the injunction sought that the school district had not been incorporated according to law, and that the trustees had not been properly elected, the argument of the petition being that the incorporation is invalid because, as shown by its field notes, it is not in a square, and because two of the trustees complained of had prior to the election for incorporation been nominated as trustees by the Goree Commercial Club, and thereafter had been permitted to serve as officers of the election, and, further, that the official ballot provided for the election did not have printed thereon at the top in large letters the words "Official Ballot"; that no legal returns of the election had been made; that proper certificate of the result had not been returned within the proper time, etc. The election of the trustees is declared to be illegal for the reason that the order therefor, the election returns thereof, and declared result all occurred prior to the filing of the ballots, poll lists, and tally sheets of the election for incorporation.

We are of the opinion that the demurrers were properly sustained. The objections to the incorporation of the independent school district and to the right of appellee trustees to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Red River Valley Brick Co. v. City of Grand Forks
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • 5 février 1914
    ... ... RIVER VALLEY BRICK COMPANY, a Domestic Corporation, School District No. 59, and the Township of Falconer, of the ... 246; Bodman v. Lake ... Fork Special Drainage Dist. 132 Ill. 439, 24 N.E. 630; ... People ex rel. Wood v ... 1021; ... State v. Independent School Dist. 29 Iowa 264; ... People ex rel. Warren v ... Crim. Rep. 279, 125 S.W. 401; Coffman ... v. Goree Independent School Dist. Tex. Civ. App. , 141 ... ...
  • Dye v. Mayor
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 3 mars 1919
    ...125 P. 666; Shriver v. Day, 114 N.E. 918; Haynes v. School District, 164. N.W. 887; Nelson v. School District, 164 N.W. 874; Coffman v. School District, 141 S.W. 132; of El Paso v. Rubhman, 46 S.W. 25; Keweenaw Asso. v. School District, 57 N.W. 404; State v. Ferguson, 134 N.W. 872; State v.......
  • Parker v. Harris County Drainage Dist. No. 2
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 5 avril 1912
    ... ... Celeste Independent School District, 132 S. W. 890, and by the Court of Civil Appeals of the econd District in Coffman v. Goree Ind. School ... Page 361 ... Dist., 141 S. W. 132. It was ... ...
  • Grisham v. Tate
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 15 janvier 1931
    ...The statement from that court last above quoted was therefore not necessary to a disposition of that case. Coffman v. Goree Independent School District (Tex. Civ. App.) 141 S. W. 132; Huggins v. Vaden (Tex. Civ. App.) 259 S. W. 204, at page 206; Kuhn v. City of Yoakum (Tex. Com. App.) 6 S.W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT