Coffman v. Roberson, 612P02.
| Decision Date | 27 February 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 612P02.,612P02. |
| Citation | 356 N.C. 668,577 S.E.2d 111 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Sarah H. COFFMAN and Harse H. Coffman v. W. Earl ROBERSON, M.D., P.A., William Earl Roberson, M.D., and Stephen L. Brewbaker, M.D. Sarah H. Coffman and Harse H. Coffman v. Delaney Radiologists Group, L.L.P.; and Mark William Ragozzino, M.D. |
G. Gray Wilson, Winston-Salem, Kevin B. Cartledge, for W. Earl Roberson, M.D., and William Earl Roberson, M.D., P.A.
William F. Maready, Winston-Salem, for Coffmans.
Prior report: 153 N.C.App. 618, 571 S.E.2d 255.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants (William Earl Roberson, M.D. and W. Earl Roberson, P.A.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of February 2003."
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
Crocker v. Roethling
...the size of the hospital, the training program, and the AHEC (Area Health Education Center) program"), disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 668, 577 S.E.2d 111 (2003). Although the trial court appropriately considered both Dr. Elliott's deposition testimony and his affidavit in determining whether t......
-
Curtis v. Café Enters., Inc.
...family, and her pastor testified to the severe emotional distress she suffered and continues to suffer"), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 668, 577 S.E.2d 111 (2003)). Here, Plaintiff does not cite to any evidence in the record to support his allegation of intentional infliction of emotional d......
-
Department of Transp. v. Charlotte Area Manufactured Housing, Inc.
...618, 571 S.E.2d 255 (2002) (quoting Edwards v. Wall, 142 N.C.App. 111, 115, 542 S.E.2d 258, 262 (2001)), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 668, 577 S.E.2d 111 (2003). Where a trial court erroneously concludes that it lacks discretion to award costs, the matter should be remanded to permit the t......
-
Day v. Brant
...based his opinion on internet research he conducted about hospital's size, training program, and other information), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 668, 577 S.E.2d 111 (2003); Leatherwood v. Ehlinger, 151 N.C.App. 15, 22-23, 564 S.E.2d 883, 888 (2002) (reversing directed verdict when plainti......
Request a trial to view additional results