Cohalan v. Carey
| Decision Date | 14 July 1982 |
| Citation | 57 N.Y.2d 672,454 N.Y.S.2d 77 |
| Parties | , 439 N.E.2d 886 In the Matter of the Application of Peter F. COHALAN, et al., Appellants, For an Order etc. v. Hugh L. CAREY, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
On the Court's own motion, appeal taken as of right dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the order appealed from is not final within the meaning of the Constitution.
Motion to vacate stay pursuant to CPLR 5519(a)(1) denied as unnecessary inasmuch as the dismissal of the appeal terminates the stay.
Motion for leave to appeal to this Court dismissed on the ground that the nonfinal order sought to be appealed from is not one within the curative purpose of CPLR 5602(a)(2).
Under the circumstances of this case, the Court, pursuant to CPLR 5514(a), orders that any other method of appeal sought to be utilized by petitioners be initiated by service upon the attorneys for respondents and by the filing with the appropriate court of the papers in pursuance thereof not later than 11:00 a.m., July 15, 1982. The order sought to be appealed from, which denied a preliminary injunction, being not only nonfinal but also involving a nonreviewable exercise of discretion by the Appellate Division, 88 A.D.2d 77, 452 N.Y.S.2d 639, it appears doubtful that any other avenue of appeal to or for review by this Court is available (cf. CPLR 5602and 5713).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Chinese Staff and Workers Ass'n v. City of New York
...reasonably exercised their discretion (Matter of Cohalan v. Carey, 88 A.D.2d 77, 79, 452 N.Y.S.2d 639, appeal dismissed 57 N.Y.2d 672, 454 N.Y.S.2d 77, 439 N.E.2d 886; H.O.M.E.S. v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., supra, 69 A.D.2d at p. 231, 418 N.Y.S.2d SEQRA requires agencies subject to ......
-
New York State Inspection, Sec. and Law Enforcement Employees, Dist. Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. Cuomo
...Governor Carey, and was met with early opposition. (See Cohalan v. Carey, 88 A.D.2d 77, 452 N.Y.S.2d 639, app. dsmd. 57 N.Y.2d 672, 454 N.Y.S.2d 77, 439 N.E.2d 886.) In January 1984, in his annual message to the Legislature, Governor Cuomo announced that the LICF would be closed as a part o......
-
New York State Inspection, Sec. and Law Enforcement Employees, Dist. Council 82, American Federation of State, County & Mun. Employees, AFL-CIO by Bischert v. Cuomo
...potentially explosive situation" it creates (Cohalan v. Carey, 88 A.D.2d 77, 82, 452 n.y. s.2d 639, 642; appeal dismissed 57 N.Y.2d 672, 454 N.Y.S.2d 77, 439 N.E.2d 886). Neither does the court decline jurisdiction herein because petitioners have not exhausted the contractual remedies outli......
-
Inland Vale Farm Co. v. Stergianopoulos
...our judgment for that of the board (see Matter of Cohalan v. Carey, 88 A.D.2d 77, 80, 452 N.Y.S.2d 639, app. dsmd. 57 N.Y.2d 672, 454 N.Y.S.2d 77, 439 N.E.2d 886), we are compelled to answer this question in the negative. SEQRA imposes on all agencies an obligation to file an EIS for any pr......