Colbert v. State, A02A0288.
| Decision Date | 29 April 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. A02A0288.,A02A0288. |
| Parties | COLBERT v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Frank M. Wood, Macon, for appellant.
Richard G. Milam, Dist. Atty., Mark S. Daniel, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Calvin Tyrone Colbert appeals from his conviction for attempted child molestation, contending that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We discern no error and affirm.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence reveals that T.J., a 14-year-old child, was at home alone with Colbert. Colbert took T.J. to a bedroom in the house where he undressed her and undressed himself. Colbert then got into bed with T.J., but before anything further happened between them, T.J.'s father came home. Still naked, Colbert ran out of the house while carrying his clothes, followed by T.J.'s enraged father.
The jury found Colbert guilty of attempted child molestation, and he now appeals. In his sole enumeration of error, Colbert contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. Short v. State, 234 Ga.App. 633, 634(1), 507 S.E.2d 514 (1998). We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility, but only determine if the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Id.; see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
A person would be guilty of criminal attempt to commit child molestation when, with intent to commit the crime, he performs any act that constitutes a substantial step toward committing the offense. See OCGA § 16-4-1. In this case, Colbert would have to perform an act that constituted a substantial step toward doing "any immoral or indecent act to or in the presence of or with any child under the age of 16 years with the intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of either the child or [himself]." OCGA § 16-6-4(a). In the event that Colbert actually completed the offense of child molestation, the jury would still be authorized to find him guilty of criminal attempt. OCGA § 16-4-2.
The evidence revealed that Colbert undressed himself and T.J. and climbed into bed with her while naked. Nothing further transpired due to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Leaptrot v. State
...trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. (Citations omitted.) Colbert v. State, 255 Ga.App. 182, 564 S.E.2d 787 (2002). (a) Charge Involving When viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows that both C.A. and R.H.......
-
Machado v. State
...actions in the child's presence that he acted with the intent to arouse or satisfy his own sexual desires). 5. See Colbert v. State, 255 Ga.App. 182, 564 S.E.2d 787 (2002); see also Gibbs v. State, 256 Ga.App. 559, 560, 568 S.E.2d 850 (2002) (victim's testimony alone can sustain child moles......
-
Tanner v. State, A02A1906.
...92, 572 S.E.2d 736 (2002) (defendant stuck hand in victim's front pocket and expressed desire to make love to her); Colbert v. State, 255 Ga.App. 182, 564 S.E.2d 787 (2002) (defendant undressed himself and child and climbed into bed with her while naked). 10. Jackson v. Virginia, supra. 11.......