Coleman v. State, 75-1749

Decision Date28 May 1976
Docket NumberNo. 75-1749,75-1749
PartiesJeremy COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Joe M. Mitchell, Jr., Melbourne, and L. B. Vocelle, Vero Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WALDEN, Chief Judge.

Defendant pleaded nolo contendere to possession of marijuana, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss. We reverse.

The Stop and Frisk Statute, Fla.Stat. § 901.151(2) (1975), provides there must be circumstances which reasonably indicate to the policeman that a person has committed, is committing, or is going to commit a crime. We carefully have reviewed the record on appeal and the testimony and, based thereon, we hold the facts surrounding the defendant's detention merely constitute bare suspicion and, therefore, are insufficient to support a stop and frisk, Stanley v. State, 327 So.2d 243 (Fla.App., 2d 1976); Richardson v. State, 291 So.2d 253 (Fla.App., 1st 1974).

We reverse the trial court's order denying defendant's motion to suppress and remand for proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CROSS, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 29, 1990
    ...297 So.2d 29 (Fla.1974). See also State v. Kehoe, 498 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), approved, 521 So.2d 1094 (Fla.1988); Coleman v. State, 333 So.2d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. den., 342 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1976). A founded suspicion is a suspicion which has a factual foundation in those circums......
  • State v. Kehoe
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 26, 1986
    ...in the light of the officer's knowledge. "Mere" or "bare" suspicion, on the other hand, cannot support detention. Coleman v. State, 333 So.2d 503 (Fla.4th DCA 1976). Mere suspicion is no better than random selection, sheer guesswork, or hunch, and has no objective justification. See Terry v......
  • State v. Beja, s. 83-1095
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 16, 1984
    ...in the light of the officer's knowledge. "Mere" or "bare" suspicion, on the other hand, cannot support detention. Coleman v. State, 333 So.2d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Mere suspicion is no better than random selection, sheer guess-work, or hunch, and has no objective justification. See Terry......
  • Stinson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 17, 2013
    ...Coladonato v. State, 348 So.2d 326, 327 (Fla.1977); accord Mullins v. State, 366 So.2d 1162, 1163 (Fla.1978); see also Coleman v. State, 333 So.2d 503, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). “A ‘founded suspicion’ is a suspicion which has some factual foundation in the circumstances observed by the offic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT