Coltraine v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital
| Decision Date | 04 April 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 773SC381,773SC381 |
| Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
| Parties | Lelia G. COLTRAINE, Administratrix of the Estate of Hubert Gray Coltraine, Deceased v. PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. |
Rodman, Rodman, Holscher & Francisco by Edward N. Rodman and David C. Francisco, Washington, for plaintiff-appellant.
Smith, Anderson, Blount & Mitchell by John H. Anderson and Joseph E. Kilpatrick, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.
We believe that plaintiff's evidence, viewed, as it must be, in the light most favorable to her, was not sufficient to overcome defendant's motion for directed verdict (G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50). In order to make out a case of negligence, plaintiff must introduce evidence tending to support the conclusion (1) that defendant was negligent and (2) that such negligence was a proximate cause of the death of plaintiff's intestate. See, e. g. McNair v. Boyette, 282 N.C. 230, 192 S.E.2d 457 (1972). As to (1), the first prerequisite for establishing negligence is the existence of a legal duty, owed by defendant to plaintiff's intestate, to use due care. The second prerequisite is a breach of that duty. Plaintiff argues, first, that the evidence was sufficient to show that the hospital personnel were negligent in applying the restraints ordered by Dr. Dawson in a manner that allowed the deceased to extricate himself. The duty, according to plaintiff, was to apply properly the restraints ordered by Dr. Dawson, and that duty, she asserts, was breached. There was, however, no evidence that the hospital breached that duty, i. e., that the hospital personnel improperly or negligently applied the posey belt and wrist cuffs. Nancy Carter's deposition stated that she was aware that Mr. Coltraine had extricated himself on previous occasions and that when she left him he was securely fastened. There was evidence that patients could extricate themselves even from properly fastened restraints. The record reveals no evidence of actionable negligence by defendant hospital.
Plaintiff also argues that there was evidence of actionable negligence in that defendant failed to provide plaintiff's intestate with round-the-clock nurses. The record shows that the doctor of Mr. Coltraine, Dr. Dawson, requested that registered nurses be assigned to the patient around the clock, that no registered nurses were available, and that, knowing this, Dr. Dawson made no alternative requests. There is no evidence that any hospital...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Williamson v. Liptzin, No. COA99-813.
...S.E.2d at 653. Thus, the court found that proximate cause did not exist. Id. at 68-69, 411 S.E.2d at 653-54. In Coltraine v. Hospital, 35 N.C.App. 755, 242 S.E.2d 538 (1978), the Administratrix of the estate of a deceased patient brought an action against a hospital for the death of the pat......
-
Burns v. Forsyth County Hosp. Authority, Inc.
...cause of Mr. Burns' injury. An essential element of proximate cause is reasonable foreseeability. Coltraine v. Pitt County Memorial Hosp., 35 N.C.App. 755, 758, 242 S.E.2d 538, 540 (1978). The evidence shows that Daniel Moore was not placed in Room 839 with Mr. Burns until two days after th......
-
Southerland v. Kapp, 8121SC1246
...the breach was the actual and proximate cause of plaintiff's injury; and damages resulted from the injury. Coltraine v. Hospital, 35 N.C.App. 755, 757-58, 242 S.E.2d 538, 540 (1978). In the case sub judice, plaintiffs have failed to establish that the defendants breached any duty owed them,......
- Great Dane Trailers, Inc. v. North Brook Poultry, Inc.