Com. v. Farmer
| Citation | 12 Mass.App.Ct. 961,428 N.E.2d 143 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Dennis E. FARMER (and a companion case 1 ). |
| Decision Date | 05 November 1981 |
| Court | Appeals Court of Massachusetts |
Robert J. Doyle, for defendants.
Richard G. Stearns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.
Before BROWN, DREBEN and KASS, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
Neither defendant contests the lawfulness of the investigatory stop which led to his arrest and, ultimately, his conviction on charges of breaking and entering in the nighttime with intent to commit larceny and stealing property. What the defendants challenge on appeal is the order to them to get out of their car in connection with that investigatory stop. Once they were out of the car, the fruits of a just completed burglary were exposed to the plain view of inquiring police officers. There was no error.
An observant citizen, one Comer, had alerted the Milton police to the presence of a green Dodge automobile which had aroused his suspicions. The vehicle was parked in a cul-de-sac at the end of Ridgewood Road adjacent to an unoccupied house. A records check by the police of the car's license plate disclosed that the plate should have been attached not to a Dodge, but to a 1973 Buick Le Sabre. (That discrepancy, which warranted the police in suspecting they were dealing with a stolen car, was cleared up when the defendant Charles Farmer was stopped; he had, in fact switched the registration from a Buick to a Dodge). The license plate was registered to a Charles L. Farmer of 83 Maple Street, Roxbury. The officers on the scene made a radio check as to whether there was any file on Charles L. Farmer in Milton. There was none, but there was a record that Dennis E. Farmer, who lived at the same address as Charles, was suspected of several breaking and enterings in Milton. As officers searched the neighborhood, Comer called again to report that two men, unknown to him, had entered the Dodge and were driving down Ridgewood Road with headlights out. When the police stopped the car shortly after it emerged from Ridgewood Road, Dennis Farmer was crouched on the floor of the car.
Once the stop was justified (which the defendants conceded), the officers could take reasonable precautions for their own protection. Such precautions may, in these circumstances, "include ordering occupants out of a car for questioning." Commonwealth v. Ferrara, 376 Mass. 502, 505, 381 N.E.2d 141 (1978). Commonwealth v. Ferrioli, --- Mass.App. ---, ---, Mass.App.Adv.Sh. (1980) 1703, 1706, 409 N.E.2d 244. In the instant case there was reason to suspect the defendants were engaged in a burglary and it was, therefore, reasonable to question them outside their car, where they would not have access...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Santana
...the vehicle, request a license and registration from [the driver], and order him out of the automobile"); Commonwealth v. Farmer, 12 Mass.App.Ct. 961, 962, 428 N.E.2d 143 (1981), cited in Loughlin, supra at 62, 430 N.E.2d 823 ("In the instant case there was reason to suspect the defendants ......
-
Com. v. Bostock
...attempt flight, with danger to the public, the police racing in pursuit, and the occupants themselves"); Commonwealth v. Farmer, 12 Mass.App.Ct. 961, 962, 428 N.E.2d 143 (1981) ("it was . . . reasonable to question [the suspects] outside their car, where they would not have access to weapon......
-
Com. v. Loughlin
...McCleery, 345 Mass. 151, 153, 186 N.E.2d 469 (1962). Compare Commonwealth v. Farmer, --- Mass.App. ---, Mass.App.Ct.Adv.Sh. (1981) 1794, 428 N.E.2d 143 (exit order held proper because it occurred before justified threshold inquiry). Because the evidence in issue was traceable to the illegal......
-
Com. v. Gonsalves, 97-P-2331
...205, 212-213, 649 N.E.2d 717 (1995); Commonwealth v. Vazquez, 426 Mass. 99, 102-103, 686 N.E.2d 993 (1997); Commonwealth v. Farmer, 12 Mass.App.Ct. 961, 962, 428 N.E.2d 143 (1981). When an officer stops a car for an apparent traffic violation and receives a license and registration that are......