Com. v. Horne
Decision Date | 14 July 1978 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Antonio HORNE, Appellant. |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Marion E. MacIntyre, Second Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Before EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, MANDERINO and LARSEN, JJ.
On May 31, 1977, a jury found appellant, Antonio Lee Horne, guilty of murder of the third degree for the shooting death of seventeen-year-old Philip Robinson. Post-verdict motions were denied, and appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than seven nor more than fifteen years. This direct appeal followed. We now affirm the judgment of sentence.
Only two issues are raised. Appellant first argues that the prosecution's evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction of murder of the third degree, contending that the evidence is sufficient only to support a verdict of voluntary manslaughter. We must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, and the evidence is sufficient if, accepting as true all the evidence and all reasonable inferences upon which, if believed, the jury could have based its verdict, it is sufficient in law to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant is guilty of murder of the third degree. See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Motley, 472 Pa. 421, 372 A.2d 764 (1977); Commonwealth v. Pitts, 450 Pa. 359, 301 A.2d 646 (1973). Reviewing the record in this light, we are persuaded that the jury's verdict of murder of the third degree is supported by sufficient evidence.
The prosecution's evidence established that early on the evening of February 19, 1977, appellant and the deceased Philip Robinson engaged in a brief altercation, including the deceased twice hitting appellant with a large stick as appellant sought to walk away from the fight. Later that evening, appellant and the deceased inadvertently met at a Harrisburg bar. The two went outside the bar, some obscenities were exchanged, and appellant pulled out a .22-caliber handgun and fired three shots toward the deceased. The third shot hit the deceased in the eye, causing brain damage and death.
Appellant argues that he can be found guilty of no more than voluntary manslaughter because he was acting under a sudden and intense passion as a result of serious provocation by the decedent at the time of the shooting. Appellant claims he acted in self-defense. The jury found otherwise, and we are satisfied there was ample evidence to support that finding.
There was no dispute that appellant was the only one of the two armed with a firearm; the deceased had only an empty wine bottle which he picked up sometime prior to the third shot being fired. The trial court, after various eyewitnesses pointed out on a chart the relative position of the deceased and appellant at the time of the shooting, estimated that the two were approximately fifty feet apart when the fatal shot was fired. Several eyewitnesses testified that the deceased was making no movement whatsoever toward appellant when appellant began shooting. Even if appellant were in some sort of imminent physical danger, it appears that from where appellant was standing he could have retreated easily and safely; indeed, there was testimony that appellant was walking backwards when he began to fire the shots.
Appellant's brief is correct in stating that "(i)f appellant were acting under a sudden and intense passion resulting...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Frederick
...of Jonathan Watson). This testimony does not show the sudden provocation required by our cases. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Horne, 479 Pa. 496, 388 A.2d 1040 (1978); Commonwealth v. Whitfield, 475 Pa. 297, 380 A.2d 362 (1977); Commonwealth v. Mason, 474 Pa. 308, 378 A.2d 807 (1977); Harris, ......
-
Commonwealth v. Moody
... ... appellant is guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted ... Commonwealth v. Horne, 479 Pa. 496, 388 A.2d 1040 ... Moreover, it ... is the province of the trier of fact, who is free to believe ... all, part or none of the ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Munoz
... ... Amos, 445 Pa. 297, 284 A.2d 748 (1977); Commonwealth ... v. Darby, 473 Pa. 109, 373 A.2d 1073 (1977); ... Commonwealth v. Horne, 479 Pa. 496, 388 A.2d 1040 ... (1978). Although a weak foundation was laid concerning ... Munoz's knowledge of Ortiz's record of arrests and ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Dreibelbis
... ... appellant is guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted ... Commonwealth v. Horne, 479 Pa. 496, 388 A.2d 1040 ... [426 A.2d 1113] ... Moreover, it ... is the province of the trier of fact, who is free to believe ... ...