Commonwealth v. Glover

Decision Date04 March 1909
Citation132 Ky. 588,116 S.W. 769
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH v. GLOVER.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County, Chancery Branch, Second Division.

"To be officially reported."

Proceedings by the Commonwealth against Henry Glover to have property of the latter assessed for taxation. From an order dismissing the proceedings, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court where an order was entered dismissing the proceedings as to certain items in the statement not sufficiently described and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

M. J Holt, for the Commonwealth.

Humphrey, Davie & Humphrey, for appellee.

LASSING J.

Two questions are involved upon this appeal: First, the right of one who is proceeded against by an auditor's agent to require the agent to verify his statement; and, second, the right of the alleged delinquent to require that the Auditor's agent shall make his statement so describe the property sought to be assessed that it can be identified.

Under the provision of section 4260 of the Kentucky Statutes (Compilation of 1909), which is as follows: "It shall be the duty of the revenue agent, and the sheriff in each county shall have like power and authority as the revenue agent for said county, to cause to be listed for taxation all property omitted by the assessor, board of supervisors, board of valuation and assessment or railroad commission, for any year or years. The officer proposing to have the property assessed shall file in the clerk's office of the county in which the property may be liable to assessment, a statement containing a description and value of the property proposed to be assessed, and the value of the corporate franchise, if any, and the name and place of residence of the owner, his agent or attorney, or person in possession of the property, and the year or years for which the property is proposed to be assessed. The clerk of the court shall thereupon issue a summons against the owner to show cause before the next regular term of the county court, which does not commence within five days after service of such summons, why such property or corporate franchise, if any, shall not be assessed at the value named in the statement filed, but no judgment by default or otherwise shall be rendered against such alleged owner unless the statement filed shall contain such a description of the property sought to be assessed as will enable the court to identify it. The summons shall be executed by the sheriff of the county by delivering a copy thereof to the owner, if in the county; if not, then to his agent, attorney or person in possession of the property. At the next regular term of the county court after the summons has been served five days, if it shall appear to the court that the property is liable for taxation, and has not been assessed, the court shall enter an order fixing the value thereof at its fair cash value, estimated as required by law; if not liable for taxation, he shall make an order to that effect, and the officer instituting said proceeding shall be liable on his official bond to the defendant for all costs incurred by him in defending said proceeding, and this shall apply to all courts to which said proceedings are taken. The judgment of the court shall have the same force and effect as the judgment of the court in civil cases. Either party may appeal from a decision of the county court to the circuit court and then to the Court of Appeals, as in other civil cases, except that no appeal bond shall be required where the appeal is by the revenue agent or sheriff. If the court shall decide that the property is liable to assessment, and has not been assessed, the clerk of the county court shall enter a judgment on a book kept for that purpose assessing said property and fixing the value thereof, and he shall certify the assessment of said property and its value, together with such other facts as may hereafter be required to appear in said judgment by section 6 of this article, to the Auditor of Public Accounts, and likewise to the sheriff of the county, together with the amount of penalty and costs of assessment, in order that the taxes due the commonwealth and county may be collected, with the penalties and costs. All persons owning property which may be assessed as herein provided, shall, in addition to the taxes, pay the costs of the proceedings and a penalty of twenty per centum on the amount of the state and county taxes due, except where such property shall have been duly listed by the owner thereof. The taxes, costs and penalties shall be collected and accounted for as other taxes and penalties are required to be collected, and by the same officers. As compensation for his services in causing such property to be assessed, the officer filing the statement shall be entitled to the penalty of twenty per centum, and the same shall be paid to him by the county tax collector collecting said county taxes and penalty thereon within thirty days after receiving same, and by the officer of the state collecting or receiving state taxes within thirty days after receiving same. The county clerk shall enter all such assessments in said book to be kept for that purpose, showing the date of the assessment, the name of the person against whom the assessment is made, the location and quantity of the property assessed, and the value thereof; and the officer collecting the taxes shall, when the same is paid, notify the clerk of its payment, which payment shall be noted by the clerk opposite the entry of such assessment"--Holland L. Anderson, revenue agent for the state at large, filed the following statement against appellee in the Jefferson county court:

"Plaintiff, commonwealth of Kentucky, by Holland L. Anderson, duly appointed, qualified and acting revenue agent for the state at large, states that the defendant, Henry Glover, was on September 1, 1907, a resident of Jefferson county, Kentucky. Plaintiff states that the said defendant on September 1, 1907, was the owner of the following personal property, to wit: Cash on hand $600; cash on deposit in the bank, $6,600; secured notes, $38,000; including lien notes, assigned to him and secured by mortgage on land in Woodford county $25,000, unsecured notes $3,000; two hundred and sixty-five shares of stock in foreign corporations not paying taxes on all their property to the state of Kentucky $25,000; fifteen bonds, $14,000; household effects, $2,000; library, $500; pictures, $500; jewelry, $250; all of which property was subject to assessment for state and county purposes for the year 1908, and no part of which was assessed by the assessor or any other assessing officer of the state or this county, at or on the date aforesaid, or for the year named. Plaintiff states that the assessment of said property at and on the date above mentioned was omitted from taxation and is yet omitted, and that none of said property has ever been listed. Plaintiff states that all of the property of the defendant as herein mentioned, of the fair cash value as herein stated, was subject to assessment for state and county taxes for the year 1908, and that the plaintiff is now entitled to recover and receive of the defendant said state and county taxes on said property for the year named. Wherefore plaintiff prays that this court may hear and determine the amount, character, and value of the property omitted by the defendant from taxation for the year 1908, and assess same against said defendant at its fair cash value, estimated at the price the same would bring at a fair voluntary sale; that said order of assessment be certified by the clerk to the auditor of this state and the sheriff of this county; that the sheriff collect said taxes on said assessment, as other taxes are collected by him, together with the costs and a penalty or fee of twenty per cent. due the relator, Holland L. Anderson, revenue agent for the state at large. Plaintiff asks for all other proper relief."

Thereafter the agent filed the following amended "statement":

"The plaintiff, commonwealth of Kentucky, by Holland L. Anderson, duly appointed, qualified, and acting revenue agent for the state at large, for amendment to its original statement and in order to make same more specific, definite, and certain, and to conform with the order of this court, states: That on September 1, 1907, the defendant, Henry Glover, was the owner of the following personal property, not set forth in the original statement, in such a specific way as to conform with the rule of this court: Accounts, $8,000; 200 shares of foreign railway stock, consisting of Pennsylvania, Reading, Atchison, Illinois Central, Union Pacific, Southern Pacific, Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul, Southern Railway, Baltimore & Ohio, Northern Pacific, $16,000; three hundred and fifty shares of foreign industrial stock not paying taxes on same to the state of Kentucky, to wit, American Car & Foundry Stock, Amalgamated Copper, American Locomotive, American Smelting & Refining, American Sugar Refining Company, American Tobacco Company, Pacific Mail, People's Gas, Pullman Palace Car, Virginia-Carolina Chemical, Pressed Steel Car, Westinghouse Electric and Western Union, $25,000; twenty-five traction bonds, to wit, Rochester, St. Louis United Railway, Springfield, Louisville Railway, New Orleans Railway & Light, Pascagoula Street Railway, Seattle Electric, $25,000; twelve city of Louisville bonds, eight Louisville water bonds, twenty railroad bonds, to wit, Pennsylvania, Reading, Atchison, Illinois Central, Union Pacific, Southern Railway, Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul, Southern Pacific, Baltimore & Ohio, and Northern Pacific, $40,000; eighteen industrial bonds of local corporations organized under the laws of the state of Kentucky,
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • State ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Buzard
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 7 Septiembre 1943
    ... ... the statute must be strictly complied with. Page v. N. Y ... Realty Co., 59 Mont. 505, 196 P. 871; Comm. v ... Glover, 132 Ky. 558, 116 S.W. 769; Windfall City v ... State, 172 Ind. 302, 88 N.E. 505; Stanton v ... Thompson, 234 Mo. 7; Cole v. Parker Washington ... ...
  • Commonwealth v. Kentucky Heating Co.
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 29 Mayo 1917
    ... ... v ... City of Louisville, 117 Ky. 895, 79 S.W. 274, 25 Ky. Law ... Rep. 2055; Com. v. American Tobacco Co., 96 S.W ... 466, 29 Ky. Law Rep. 745; First National Bank v ... Hopkinsville, 128 Ky. 383, 108 S.W. 311, 32 Ky. Law Rep ... 1283, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 685; Com. v. Glover, 132 ... Ky. 588, 116 S.W. 769; Com. v. Kentucky Dist. & Warehouse ... Co., 143 Ky. 314, 136 S.W. 1032; Com. v. J. M ... Robinson, Norton & Co., 146 Ky. 218, 142 S.W. 406. It ... has been decided over and again by this court that the ... assessment of the "franchise" includes all ... ...
  • State ex rel. Fidelity Natl. Bank & Trust v. Buzard, 38207.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 7 Septiembre 1943
    ...down in the statute must be strictly complied with. Page v. N.Y. Realty Co., 59 Mont. 505, 196 Pac. 871; Comm. v. Glover, 132 Ky. 558, 116 S.W. 769; Windfall City v. State, 172 Ind. 302, 88 N.E. 505; Stanton v. Thompson, 234 Mo. 7; Cole v. Parker Washington Co., 276 Mo. 220; Bostick v. McIn......
  • State ex rel. West v. Mccafferty
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 9 Noviembre 1909
    ...39 Am. Dec. 187; Missouri v. Walker, 88 Mo. 279, 125 U.S. 339; Merrill v. Sherburne, 1 N. H. 213; Cooley, Const. Lim., 359; Commw. v. Glover (Ky.) 116 S.W. 769; Baker v. City of Utica, 19 N.Y. 326; 8 Cyc. 944; Selma B. & L. Ass'n v. Morgan, 57 Ala. 33; State v. Brewer, 64 Ala. 287; Commw. v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT