Commonwealth v. Sheedy
| Decision Date | 16 May 1893 |
| Citation | 159 Mass. 55,34 N.E. 84 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. SHEEDY. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
C.N. Harris, Second Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.
Sprague &
Washburn, for defendant.
The indictment in this case charges that the defendant, at a time and place stated, "did dispose of one suit of clothing, of the value of thirty-five dollars, by way of lottery." Pub.St. c. 209, § 1. While the indictment follows the language of the statute, yet, as it charges a specific act, this is not enough. The defendant is entitled to have the offense set out with the usual precision and certainty. The person to whom the suit of clothing was disposed of should be alleged, or, if he was unknown, this fact should be stated. This has been held to be the rule in regard to an illegal sale of liquor. Com. v. Thurlow, 24 Pick. 374, 379; Com. v. Kimball, 7 Metc. (Mass.) 304, 308. And in Com. v. Moore, 11 Cush. 600, it was held that an indictment for letting a tenement to be used for purposes of prostitution must state the name of the person to whom the tenement was let, or that such person was to the jurors unknown. In Com. v. Horton, 2 Gray, 69, on which the government relies, the offense charged was the setting up of a lottery. See, also, Com. v. Harris, 13 Allen, 534; Com. v. Sullivan, 146 Mass. 142, 15 N.E. 491. In Com. v. Brockway, 150 Mass. 322, 23 N.E. 101, no objection was made to the form of the indictment. For the reasons above stated we are of opinion that the defendant's motion to quash the indictment should have been granted.
Exceptions sustained.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Commonwealth v. Di Stasio
...280; Commonwealth v. Hill, 11 Cush. 137, 141; Commonwealth v. Merrick, 255 Mass. 510, 513, 152 N.E. 377. See, also, Commonwealth v. Sheedy, 159 Mass. 55, 34 N.E. 84; Commonwealth v. Hebert, 264 Mass. 571, 575, 163 189. The amendment did not change the substance of the crime charged, but res......
-
State v. J. R. Wersebe
... ... should allege a description of the lottery. 38 C. J. 313, ... § 58. A few cases are: Commonwealth v ... Johnson, Thacher, Cr. Cas. (Mass.) 284; ... Commonwealth v. Clapp, 22 Mass. 41; ... Commonwealth v. Hooper, 22 Mass. 42; ... Commonwealth ... would be no game of hazard." ... In ... Commonwealth v. Sheedy, 159 Mass. 55, 34 ... N.E. 84, an indictment charging in the words of the statute ... that the respondent did dispose of one suit of clothing of ... ...
-
Duin v. State
...See also Harmon v. State, 47 Ala.App. 1, 249 So. 369 (Mass. 7th Div. 52, opinion on rehearing Dec. 15, 1970); Commonwealth v. Sheedy, 159 Mass. 55, 34 N.E. 84; McLaughlin v. State, 45 Ind. As above stated, there was on the instant record no error in denying the motion to exclude because of ......
-
State v. Wersebe
...the plea of not guilty, that no prizes, were to be distributed, for in such case there would be no game of hazard." In Commonwealth v. Sheedy, 159 Mass. 55, 34 N. E. 84, an indictment charging in the words of the statute that the respondent did dispose of one suit of clothing of the value o......