Community Credit Co. of Lenoir v. Norwood, 314
| Decision Date | 02 May 1962 |
| Docket Number | No. 314,314 |
| Citation | 125 S.E.2d 369,257 N.C. 87 |
| Parties | COMMUNITY CREDIT COMPANY OF LENOLR, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Arthur R. NORWOOD, Defendant, and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Intervenor. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Hugh M. Wilson, Lenoir, for plaintiffappellant.
Hal B. Adams, Lenoir, for defendant Norwood.
Townsend & Todd by James R. Todd, Jr., Lenoir, for intervenor.
The findings, conclusions, and judgment require a determination of the effect of c. 835, S.L.1961, on prior statutes relating to the registration of motor vehicles which were sold and encumbered between 1 July 1961 and 1 January 1962.
Prior to 1961 the owner of an automobile was required to apply to the Department of Motor Vehicles and obtain a registration for the vehicle before operating it on the highways. G.S. § 20-50. He was likewise required to apply to the Department for a certificate of title, showing in his application his name and address, a description of the vehicle sufficient to identify it, his title and all liens thereon, with such additional information as the Department might need to determine if it was entitled to registration. G.S. § 20-52. Upon a proper showing the Department issued to the owner a registration card and a certificate of title showing the name and address of the owner, a statement of his title, and all liens or encumbrances thereon. G.S § 20-57. When a registered vehicle was sold the owner was required to endorse and deliver his certificate of title to the purchaser unless sold subject to a lien for the purchase price. G.S. § 20-72. If the purchaser executed a lien for the purchase money, the lienee could retain the old certificate, but it was his duty in that event to forward the certificate with a statement of the lien to the Department within twenty days. G.S. § 20-72. If the new owner purchased free of encumbrance, it was his duty to make application for transfer of title and registration within twenty days after he made his purchase. If the certificate of title and registration certificate were retained by the lien holder, it was the purchaser's duty to see that these papers were forwarded to the Department within twenty days. G.S. § 20-74. A dealer acquiring an automobile for resale was not required to have title to that vehicle registered in his name but he was required to deliver to the purchaser the registration certificate and title which had been issued to the dealer's vendor and to notify the Department of such sale. G.S. § 20-75.
Prior to 1961 a purchaser of a motor vehicle acquired title notwithstanding the failure of his vendor to deliver vendor's certificate of title or vendee's failure to apply for a new certificate. In Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 242 N.C. 1, 86 S.E.2d 745, the court charged: 'Now, the law does not prohibit the sale of a motor vehicle without a transfer and delivery of certificate of registration of title; in other words, one can sell a motor vehicle on one day and the title pass, and deliver or transfer the paper certificate of title on a later date.' This Court, in approving that instruction, said: '(I)t is observed that the instruction as given is precisely in accord with the decision in Carolina Discount Corporation v. Landis Motor Co., 190 N.C. 157, 129 S.E. 414.' Similar interpretation was given the statute in Southern Auto Finance Co. v. Pittman, 253 N.C. 550, 117 S.E.2d 423; 32 N.C.Law Review 545.
While purchaser's title was not dependent upon the certificate of title which it was his duty to apply for, he was guilty of a misdemeanor if he willfully failed to apply for a certificate within twenty days after he purchased. G.S. § 20-73.
G.S. § 20-72(b) was amended by sec. 8, c. 835, S.L.1961, by adding at the end of that section the following sentence: 'Transfer of ownership in a vehicle by an owner is not effective until the provisions of this subsection have been complied with.' Sec. 9 made like amendment to G.S. § 20-75. The quoted portion of the 1961 Act became effective 1 July 1961. Since 1 July 1961 the purchaser of an automobile does not acquire title until he has complied with the provisions of G.S. § 20-72 (b) and 75. These sections make it the duty of the purchaser to secure from his vendor the old certificate duly endorsed or assigned and to apply for a new certificate. They do not relate to the duty of the Department to issue a new certificate. What the amendments of 1961 say is: The vesting of title is deferred until the purchaser has the old certificate endorsed to him and makes application for a new certificate.
If, as appellee argues, the Legislature intended the quoted amendment to mean purchaser acquired no title until the Department issued him a certificate, it would doubtless have said: 'Title shall not pass to purchaser until the Department has issued him a new certificate' or some other plain and positive language to that effect. The intent, declared in the preamble, to prevent vendor from using the old certificate to entrap the unwary was effectively accomplished by the language selected by the Legislature.
The court found as a fact the certificates of title were forwarded to the Department prior to 13 December 1961. Title...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
International Service Ins. Co. v. Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.
...v. Pittman, 253 N.C. 550, 117 S.E.2d 423; Godwin v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co., 256 N.C. 730, 125 S.E.2d 23; Community Credit Co. v. Norwood, 257 N.C. 87, 125 S.E.2d 369; Home Indemnity Co. v. West Trade Motors Inc., 258 N.C. 647, 129 S.E.2d 248; Luther v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance ......
-
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hayes
...in (National Bank of Sanford) Bank v. (Greensboro) Motor Co., supra (264 N.C. 568, 142 S.E.2d 166), and (Community) Credit Co. v. Norwood, supra (257 N.C. 87, 125 S.E.2d 369).' Had there been no later change in the statutory law, in view of the fact that here delivery had occurred, Insuranc......
-
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Wayne Finance Co., 306
...who has a recorded mortgage, or has possession of the chattel for the purpose of securing mortgagor's debt, Community Credit Co. v. Norwood, 257 N.C. 87, 125 S.E2d 369; M. & J. Finance Corp. v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 580, 55 S.E.2d 201. Since plaintiff's mortgages were first recorded, and it had ......
-
Younts v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...prior decisions in National Bank of Sanford v. Greensboro Motor Co., supra (264 N.C. 568, 142 S.E.2d 166), and Community Credit Co. v. Norwood, supra (257 N.C. 87, 125 S.E.2d 369).' (The accident in the present case occurred 3 November See Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Insura......