Coniglio v. Snyder
Decision Date | 31 May 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 13-87-074-CV,13-87-074-CV |
Citation | 756 S.W.2d 743 |
Parties | Joseph CONIGLIO, Appellant, v. Michael SNYDER, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Darrell Barger, Carlos Villarreal, Hunt, Hermansen, McKibben & Barger, Corpus Christi, for appellant.
Pat Morris, Nicolas, Morris & Barrow, Corpus Christi, for appellee.
Before UTTER, KENNEDY and BENAVIDES, JJ.
Appellant, Joseph Coniglio, was sued by appellee for malicious prosecution. The jury awarded appellee $638,841.84. The trial court conditioned a new trial on the acceptance of a $200,000.00 remittitur. Appellant challenges on appeal the sufficiency of the evidence to support the elements of malicious prosecution and the form of the jury charge. Appellee challenges the remittitur. We reverse and render the judgment of the trial court.
By appellant's fifth through thirteenth points of error, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the elements of malicious prosecution. In order to maintain an action for malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove that there was a prosecution by the defendants, that it was malicious, that it was without probable cause, that the prosecution ended in acquittal, and that the plaintiff suffered damages. Ada Oil Company v. Dillaberry, 440 S.W.2d 902, 909-10 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1969, writ dism'd).
We examine events prior to the institution of legal proceedings to determine if a defendant had probable cause to act. Akin v. Dahl, 661 S.W.2d 917, 920 (Tex.1983). There is initially a presumption that a defendant acted in good faith and with probable cause. The presumption disappears when the plaintiff produces evidence to the contrary. The burden of proof then shifts to the defendant to offer independent proof of probable cause. Id. Once the opposing parties have entered into a factual contest on the issue of probable cause, a fact issue is created for resolution by the trier of fact. Id. It is proper for the trier of fact to consider all evidence which a prosecuting party knew or should have known of the plaintiff's condition and upon which evidence the prosecuting party based or should have based his action. Id. at 921.
A prosecuting party who files a criminal complaint does so upon probable cause where, in good faith, he makes a full and fair disclosure of the facts and circumstances known to him at the time. Marathon Oil Co. v. Salazar, 682 S.W.2d 624, 627 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Unless a person fairly discloses information to a prosecuting attorney, in good faith, probable cause does not exist. Id. Probable cause has been defined as a state of mind in which the facts are regarded from the point of view of the prosecuting party. Id. The question is not what the actual facts were, but what he honestly believed them to be. Id.
We will review the evidence regarding lack of probable cause following the standard set forth in Pool v. Ford Motor Co., 715 S.W.2d 629 (Tex.1986); Dyson v. Olin Corp., 692 S.W.2d 456 (Tex.1985); Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co., 619 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.1981); Garza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821 (Tex.1965); Allied Finance Co. v. Garza, 626 S.W.2d 120 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.); and Calvert, No Evidence and Insufficient Evidence Points of Error, 38 Texas L.Rev. 361 (1960).
The evidence presented at trial showed that Coniglio and Dr. Byrne, through their business, Specialty Center Condominiums, entered into contracts with Snyder Contracting Ltd., appellee's company, to do construction work on an office condominium project. The contract primarily in issue in this case was for foundation work, at a cost of $52,400.00.
Snyder began work on the project in 1983 and submitted the following bills to Coniglio and Byrne for work performed: $16,423.00 on July 13, 1983; $10,406.00 on July 28, 1983; and $2,376.00 on October 7, 1983. It is undisputed that Coniglio paid these bills. Snyder's limited partnership was dissolved before the project was finished and another company completed the job. Coniglio testified that he began getting bills and notices that liens had been filed from subcontractors on the job who claimed they had not been paid for work performed. Coniglio said he paid more than $30,000.00 to the subcontractors in addition to the $31,734.00 he paid appellee. These expenditures were approximately $9,000.00 more than the cost of the contract price of $52,400.00. Coniglio testified at trial that he believed he was being billed by subcontractors for materials he had previously paid. Dr. Byrne, appellant's partner, contacted an attorney to look into the matter. The attorney, Richard Crews, testified that he contacted the district attorney's office to see if there was a case. Coniglio claimed that problems regarding liens on the property arose in mid-November. Appellee was later indicted for mismanagement of fiduciary funds. The indictment was later dismissed.
Snyder argues that Coniglio did not have probable cause to prosecute him because the bills which Coniglio paid to extinguish the liens were for expenses incurred after the initial payment of $31,734.00. Snyder claims that because this information was at Coniglio's disposal when his partner contacted an attorney to look into the matter, the information he signed and furnished to the police was false. The information furnished to the police was a sworn statement signed by Coniglio and Byrne in which they stated that they paid $31,734.00 to Snyder Contracting Limited and that the company ceased doing business on October 31, 1983. Subsequently, they began receiving payment requests from material suppliers for work performed. They claimed they had paid $30,153.44 to suppliers that should have been paid by Snyder Contracting Limited.
Coniglio testified at trial that he believed he had paid several bills twice. He said that appellee's bills did not specify what he was actually being charged for. The following bill was sent by Snyder to Coniglio and Byrne on July 28, 1983:
Snyder Contracting Ltd.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. Lieck
...is evidence of causation, lack of probable cause, and malice. See e.g. Compton, 811 S.W.2d at 950; Coniglio v. Snyder, 756 S.W.2d 743, 747 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied) (no evidence of lack of full and fair disclosure or false statement, judgment for plaintiff reversed); Fish......
-
Digby v. Texas Bank
...and (5) damaging the plaintiff. ITT Consumer Financial Corporation, 932 S.W.2d at 160, citing Coniglio v. Snyder, 756 S.W.2d 743, 744 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied) and Dominguez v. Kelly, 786 S.W.2d 749, 751 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1990, writ denied). See also James v. Brown, 637 ......
-
Martin v. Thomas
...1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.). There are also many cases which exclude the element: see, Coniglio v. Snyder, 756 S.W.2d 743, 744 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied); McHenry v. Tom Thumb Page Drug Stores, 696 S.W.2d 664, 665 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1985, writ dism'd); Fisher v. Beach, 671 S.W......
-
Richey v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
...cause for the proceedings; (6) malice in filing the charge; and (7) damage to the plaintiff. See Coniglio v. Snyder, 756 S.W.2d 743, 744 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied); see also Ellis County State Bank v. Keever, 888 S.W.2d 790, 793-94 (Tex.1994); Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc. ......
-
Other Workplace Torts
...Ltd. P’ship v. Suberu , 113 S.W.3d 588, 597 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, rev’d 216 S.W.3d 788 (Tex. 2006) (criminal); Coniglio v. Snyder , 756 S.W.2d 743, 744 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied) (criminal); Louis v. Blalock , 543 S.W.2d 715, 719 (Tex. Civ. App.—Amarillo 1976, writ ref’d......
-
Table of cases
...Coney v. Dallas Housing Auth. , No. Civ. A. 3-01-CV-2337-L, 2003 WL 292167 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2003), §19:4.D.2 Coniglio v. Snyder , 756 S.W.2d 743 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied), §30:9.A Connecticut v. Teal , 457 U.S. 440 (1982), §§18:7.H.2, 24:3.B, 24:4.E.1.b Conne v. Speedee......
-
Other workplace torts
...Ltd. P’ship v. Suberu , 113 S.W.3d 588, 597 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, rev’d 216 S.W.3d 788 (Tex. 2006) (criminal); Coniglio v. Snyder , 756 S.W.2d 743, 744 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied) (criminal); Louis v. Blalock , 543 S.W.2d 715, 719 (Tex. Civ. App.—Amarillo 1976, writ ref’d......
-
Table of cases
...Coney v. Dallas Housing Auth. , No. Civ. A. 3-01-CV-2337-L, 2003 WL 292167 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2003), §19:4.D.2 Coniglio v. Snyder , 756 S.W.2d 743 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied), §30:9.A Connecticut v. Teal , 457 U.S. 440 (1982), §§18:7.H.2, 24:3.B, 24:4.E.1.b Conne v. Speedee......