Contractors Supply Co. v. Labor and Indus. Relations Commission, WD
| Decision Date | 30 March 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. WD,WD |
| Citation | 614 S.W.2d 563 |
| Parties | CONTRACTORS SUPPLY COMPANY, Respondent, v. LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, Division of Employment Security and James Tyrone Thomas, Appellants. 31918. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Timothy P. Duggan, Labor & Industrial Relations Com'n, Rick V. Morris, Div. of Employment Security, Jefferson City, for appellants.
Clifton L. Elliott and Gina Kaiser, Roan & Grossman, Kansas City, for respondent.
Before KENNEDY, P. J., and SHANGLER and SOMERVILLE, JJ.
The appeal concerns the claim for unemployment compensation of a worker who voluntarily left employment. The Industrial Commission determined that the worker left for good cause and allowed the benefit. The circuit court reversed that decision and entered judgment for the employer. The worker and the agency appeal.
The claimant Thomas was employed by Contractors Supply Company as a porter for about five years. The normal work week was Monday through Friday, but to facilitate his custodial duty, Thomas worked on Saturday and Sunday. The employer testified that the work arrangement was at the request of Thomas for a more flexible schedule. Thomas testified that the weekend work was imposed by the employer. In any event, Thomas never worked more that a forty-hour week. Then, without reason other than that of "disgust" Thomas quit. The employer suggested that Thomas was prompted by an order by the bankruptcy court to withhold for remittance a sum of money from the Thomas wages. The worker advanced numerous grievances to justify the termination of employment: wages due for weekend work, discriminatory denial of participation in the company education program, imposed work duty as a utility man without commensurate pay, among other complaints.
The Industrial Commission found that
(t)he primary reason the claimant left his work was because the employer did not pay him overtime wages for weekend work. It is found that the claimant's version of the agreement under which he worked for the employer is the more accurate account of his employment contract. It is found that the claimant should have been paid overtime wages for at least some of the weekend work he performed. Considering the record as a whole, it is found the claimant had good cause to leave his work on May 16, 1979 because he was not paid overtime wages for weekend work. Therefore, it is found the claimant voluntarily left his work on May 16, 1979, with good cause attributable to his employer.
The circuit court adjudged that nothing in the record supported a finding of overtime wage agreement and reversed the decision of the Commission. That the evidence may favor or disfavor an inference of an employment agreement to pay overtime wages for weekend work, however, neither proves nor fails to prove that the voluntary termination of employment was for good cause.
The statute disqualifies from unemployment compensation benefits a worker who has left his work voluntarily without good cause attributable to his work or to his employer. § 288.050.1(1). A worker has good cause to terminate employment voluntarily when that conduct conforms to what an average person, who acts with reasonableness and in good faith, would do. Belle State Bank v. Industrial Commission Division of Employment Security, 547 S.W.2d 841, 846(5) (Mo.App.1977). The burden to prove good cause rests on the claimant, and whether the evidence meets the burden poses a question of law. Citizens Bank of Shelbyville v. Industrial Commission, 428 S.W.2d 895, 897(1-3) (Mo.App.1968). The question on appeal, then, is not whether the evidence proved the right to overtime wages under a work contract, 1 but whether the decision to quit the job was reasonable and in good faith. Central Missouri Paving Company, Inc. v. Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 575 S.W.2d 889, 892(1-3) (Mo.App.1978).
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Shelby v. Hayward Baker, Inc.
...and Industrial Relations Comm'n, 959 S.W.2d 479, 482 (Mo. App.1998); Clark, 875 S.W.2d at 627; Contractors Supply Co. v. Labor and Industrial Relations Comm'n, 614 S.W.2d 563, 565 (Mo.App.1981). Shelby's third point is The Commission's decision that Shelby was disqualified from receiving un......
-
McAlister v. Missouri Div. of Employment Sec.
...question of law, that is, whether his decision to quit was reasonable and in good faith. Contractors Supply Company v. Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 614 S.W.2d 563, 564-65 (Mo.App.1981). Our second avenue is to examine the federal statutes, regulations and guidelines applicable......
-
Bishop v. Metro Restoration Services, Inc.
...be considered on appeal. See Lusher v. Gerald Harris Constr., Inc., 993 S.W.2d 537, 545 (Mo.App.1999) and Contractors Supply Co. v. L.I.R.C., 614 S.W.2d 563, 564 n. 2 (Mo.App.1981). Nothing in Claimant's brief identifies the ruling or action of the Commission which she is challenging; state......
-
Mitchell v. Division of Employment Sec., State of Mo.
...is in conformity with what an average person, who acts reasonably and in good faith, would do. Contractors Supply Co. v. Labor & Indus. Relations Comm'n, 614 S.W.2d 563, 564 (Mo.App.W.D.1981). The term "good cause" has no fixed meaning, but depends on the circumstances of each case. Citizen......