Costanza v. Seinfeld
Decision Date | 21 June 1999 |
Citation | 693 N.Y.S.2d 897,181 Misc.2d 562 |
Parties | MICHAEL COSTANZA, Plaintiff,<BR>v.<BR>JERRY SEINFELD et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court |
Jonathan B. Fisher, New York City, for plaintiff.
Davis, Wright, Tremaine L. L. P., New York City (Elizabeth McNamara of counsel), for defendants.
A person is seeking an enormous sum of money for claims that the New York State courts have rejected for decades. This could be the plot for an episode in a situation comedy. Instead, it is the case brought by plaintiff Michael Costanza who is suing the comedian, Jerry Seinfeld, Larry David (who was the cocreator of the television program Seinfeld), the National Broadcasting Company, Inc. and the production companies for $100 million. He is seeking relief for violation of New York's Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51, being cast in a false light, invasion of privacy and defamation.
The substantive assertions of the complaint are that the defendants used the name and likeness of plaintiff Michael Costanza without his permission, that they invaded his privacy, that he was portrayed in a negative, humiliating light and that he was defamed by defendant Larry David when reports were published by a spokesman that plaintiff Michael Costanza had a tenuous connection and was a "flagrant opportunist" seeking to cash in when the hyperbole of the Seinfeld program's final episode was at its peak. Plaintiff Michael Costanza asserts that the fictional character of George Costanza in the television program Seinfield is based upon him. In the show, George Costanza is a long-time friend of the lead character, Jerry Seinfeld. He is constantly having problems with poor employment situations, disastrous romantic relationships, conflicts with his parents and general self-absorption.
These aspects are part of the comedic interplay with Jerry Seinfeld and the other actors[1] that lead to the great success of the television show Seinfeld. Plaintiff Michael Costanza points to various similarities between himself and the character George Costanza to bolster his claim that his name and likeness are being appropriated. He claims that, like him, George Costanza is short, fat, bald, that he knew Jerry Seinfeld from college purportedly as the character George Costanza did and they both came from Queens. Plaintiff Michael Costanza asserts that the self-centered nature and unreliability of the character George Costanza are attributed to him and this humiliates him.
In New York State, there is no common-law right to privacy (see, Freihofer v Hearst Corp., at 140) and any relief must be sought under the statute (Civil Rights Law §§ 50, 51).
The court now turns to the assertion that plaintiff Michael Costanza's name and likeness are being appropriated without his written consent. This claim faces several separate obstacles. First, defendants assert that plaintiff Michael Costanza has waived any claim by appearing on the show.[2] The statute clearly provides that written consent is necessary for use of a person's name or likeness (see, Kane v Orange County Publs., 232 AD2d 526 [2d Dept 1996]). However, defendants note the limited nature of the relief provided by Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51. It extends only to the use of a name or likeness for trade or advertising (see, Freihofer v Hearst Corp., at 140). The sort of commercial exploitation prohibited and compensable if violated is solicitation for patronage (see, Delan v CBS, Inc., 91 AD2d 255 [2d Dept 1983]). In a case similar to this lawsuit involving the play "Six Degrees of Separation", it was held that "works of fiction and satire do not fall within the narrow scope of the statutory phrases `advertising' and `trade'" (Hampton v Guare, 195 AD2d 366 [1st Dept 1993]). The Seinfeld television program was a fictional comedic presentation. It does not fall within the scope of trade or advertising (see, Freihofer v Hearst Corp., supra; Hampton v Guare, supra).
Plaintiff Michael Costanza's claim for violation of Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51 must be dismissed. Additionally, plaintiff Michael Costanza's claim under Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51 is barred by the Statute of Limitations. This type of case must be brought within one year of when a person learns of the improper use of his name or likeness (see, Castel v Sherlock Corp., 159 AD2d 233 [1st Dept 1990]).
Plaintiff Michael Costanza's final claim involves the reports that defendant Larry David or individuals on his behalf stated that he was a "flagrant opportunist who barely knew Jerry (Seinfeld) less than a year." An exhibit to the defendants' moving papers is a copy of a book by plaintiff Michael Costanza entitled "The Real Seinfeld". The book was published at the time of the final episode of the show Seinfeld. The use of the phrase "flagrant opportunist" in the context of the circumstances under which it was uttered is a statement of opinion (see, Shinn v Williamson, 225 AD2d 605 [2d Dept 1996]). This claim of defamation is also dismissed.[3]
Finally, defendants seek sanctions against plaintiff for pursuing a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kenny Kramer & Kramer's Reality Tours, Inc. v. Skyhorse Publ'g, Inc.
...claims ultimately arise from a particular episode of the Seinfeld show, a “fictional comedic representation” ( Costanza v. Seinfeld, 181 Misc.2d 562, 566, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897 [Sup.Ct., New York County 1999],affd. as mod.,279 A.D.2d 255, 719 N.Y.S.2d 29 [1st Dept.2001] ), co-written and co-crea......
-
Riverstone Assocs., LP v. Campbell
...supra, in it's submission, see Affirmation of Arianna Gonzalez–Abreau, Esq., dated March 4, 2015 at ¶ 34.43 Costanza v. Seinfeld, 181 Misc.2d 562, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897 (Sup.Ct.N.Y. County [1999] ), where "... there is no genuine basis either in law or fact, or good faith argument for a change i......
-
Costanza v. Seinfeld
...name, likeness and persona of the Plaintiff to create the character of George Costanza" for the Seinfeld television program, the court (181 Misc.2d 562) properly dismissed plaintiff's invasion of privacy and Civil Rights Law causes of action. New York places claims for invasion of privacy e......
-
Costanza v. Seinfeld
...name, likeness and persona of the Plaintiff to create the character of George Costanza" for the Seinfeld television program, the court (181 Misc 2d 562) properly dismissed plaintiff's invasion of privacy and Civil Rights Law causes of action. New York places claims for invasion of privacy e......
-
Related State Torts
...Right to Privacy [§3:58] Not all states recognize the common law tort of invasion of privacy. See, e.g., Costanza v. Seinfeld , 181 Misc.2d 562, 564, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897, 899 (N.Y. 1999) (dismissing plaintiff Michael Costanza’s $100 million lawsuit against Jerry Seinfeld, Larry David and NBC f......