Cotton States Ins. Co. v. Bates
Decision Date | 12 November 1976 |
Docket Number | No. 2,No. 52818,52818,2 |
Citation | 140 Ga.App. 428,231 S.E.2d 445 |
Parties | COTTON STATES INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. D. D. BATES |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Charles L. Drew, Atlanta, for appellants.
E. Carl Prince, Jr., Carrollton, for appellee.
The State Board of Workmen's Compensation approved a 'Standard Form' agreement as to compensation between the claimant, appellee here, and the employer, appellant here. Within 30 days of the approval thereof the appellant filed a motion that the agreement be set aside because it was entered into through a mistake of fact on its part. The Board in response to the motion vacated its order approving the 'Standard Form' agreement as to compensation. The matter was then set for a hearing and subsequent thereto the Board reinstated the approval of the agreement. This award was affirmed by the Superior Court and the case is here for review. Held:
The State Board of Workmen's Compensation was without authority to vacate its original order which approved the 'Standard Form agreement as to compensation.' As was stated in Robinson v. Zurich Ins. Co., 131 Ga.App. 795, 796, 207 S.E.2d 209:
It should also be noted that this same rule of law was applied in St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Bridges, 106 Ga.App. 621, 127 S.E.2d 699, where it was held that the agreement may not be vacated even if the motion to do so is made within 30 days from the date the agreement was approved. Therefore, the order of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation vacating the original approval of the agreement as to compensation was void.
As has been stated previously by this court the only remedy for a person who contends that an agreement was entered into through fraud, accident or mistake is in a court of equity.
The appellant contends that the 1975 amendment to Code § 114-708 (Ga.L.1963, pp. 141, 156; 1975, pp. 198, 208) confers authority upon the Board to vacate its original award and deny compensation. With this...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McGinty v. Alfred L. Simpson & Co.
...the period for seeking appellate review is only to permit correction of mistakes which appear in the record. Cotton States Ins. Co. v. Bates, 140 Ga.App. 428, 231 S.E.2d 445 (1976). "The intent of [OCGA § 34-9-103(b) is] not to open the case for a de novo hearing...." Id. at 429, 231 S.E.2d......
- Epps v. Chattahoochee Brick Co., 52808
-
Walker v. Continental Ins. Co.
...board may not vacate, set aside, or modify a prior final award in the absence of a change of condition. See Cotton States Ins. Co. v. Bates, 140 Ga.App. 428, 231 S.E.2d 445 (1976) and cases cited therein. The second line of authority deals with provisional or conditional approval, where the......
-
Wills v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
...795, 796, 207 S.E.2d 209 (1974); Jeffares v. Travelers Ins. Co., 138 Ga.App. 903, 228 S.E.2d 1 (1976); Cotton States Ins. Co. v. Bates, 140 Ga.App. 428, 231 S.E.2d 445 (1976); Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Burkhart, 141 Ga.App. 296, 233 S.E.2d 235 (1977). The oft-repeated principle is perhaps best s......