Cox v. Western Supermarkets, Inc.
Decision Date | 17 November 1989 |
Citation | 557 So.2d 831 |
Parties | Louise M. COX v. WESTERN SUPERMARKETS, INC. 88-697. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Jeffrey C. Kirby of Pittman, Hooks, Marsh, Dutton & Hollis, Birmingham, for appellant.
Bert P. Taylor of Smith & Taylor, Birmingham, for appellee.
The plaintiff, Louise M. Cox, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Western Supermarkets, Inc., in her action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a slip and fall accident at the defendant's store. She alleged that the defendant had negligently maintained the floor at its supermarket and that its negligence had caused her injuries. We reverse and remand.
On a Sunday afternoon in 1985, the plaintiff was shopping at Western Supermarket in Hoover, Alabama. While walking through the produce department, she slipped and fell on a slippery spot, and, as a result, she suffered an injury to her right foot. Prior to her fall, she said, she had observed the floor and that it appeared to be clear. She said that after her fall she saw nothing on the floor that could have caused her injury, but that she felt a small wet spot on the right seat of her pants. It is undisputed that no one ever saw or discovered anything on the floor. The produce section required ice to ensure the freshness of the vegetables. Periodically, and on this particular day, ice was transported to this area from the back of the store and was placed directly on the produce shelves. Special rubber mats were placed in the produce aisle to keep the area clean and dry. Furthermore, store employees were responsible for maintaining the produce section and for inspecting the floor in this area to ensure that it was clean and dry. The store manager, Harold Randall Winslett, arrived at work at 12:00 noon on the day in question and assumed his duty of walking the floor of the entire store on a periodic basis to ensure a safe store condition.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Knox v. United States
...or (3) by showing that the store was otherwise delinquent in failing to discover and to remove the substance. Id.;Cox v. W. Supermarkets, Inc., 557 So.2d 831, 832 (Ala.1989); Richardson v. Kroger Co., 521 So.2d 934, 935–36 (Ala.1988); see also Williams v. Wal–Mart Stores, Inc., 584 F.Supp.2......
-
Golba v. Kohl's Dept. Store, Inc.
...substance or item on the floor after the accident happened. See, e.g., Ciminski, supra ("liquidlike substance"); Cox v. Western Supermarkets, Inc. (1989), Ala., 557 So.2d 831, reh'g denied (liquid); Winn-Dixie of Greenville v. Ramey (1988), 186 Ga.App. 257, 366 S.E.2d 785, reh'g denied (liq......
-
Mills v. Bruno's, Inc.
...will be liable only if it failed to use reasonable care in maintaining its premises in a reasonably safe manner. Cox v. Western Supermarkets, Inc., 557 So.2d 831, 832 (Ala.1989). At trial, the plaintiff will carry the burden of showing that the injury was proximately caused by the negligenc......
-
Lawson v. United States
...by showing that the store was otherwise delinquent in failing to discover and remove the substance. Id. at 16; Cox v. Western Supermarkets, Inc., 557 So. 2d 831, 832 (Ala. 1989); Richardson v. KrogerCo., 521 So. 2d 934, 935-36 (Ala. 1988); see also Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 584 F. ......