Craig v. State, 73251
| Decision Date | 03 July 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 73251,73251 |
| Citation | 583 So.2d 1018 |
| Parties | Donnie Gene CRAIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 583 So.2d 1018, 16 Fla. L. Week. S480 |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Michael L. Sullivan, Okeechobee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Donnie Gene Craig appeals his convictions for first-degree murder, burglary, robbery, and grand theft, and his resulting sentences, including the death sentence. We have jurisdiction. 1 We find that we must reverse Craig's convictions and order a new trial because of the manner in which Craig's jury was selected.
One issue in this case is dispositive. It is Craig's claim that the trial court's denial of his motion to draw the jury pool from all of Palm Beach County, rather than from the West Palm Beach jury district, denied him the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by article I, section 2, of the Florida Constitution, and the sixth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution. We resolved this issue concerning the Palm Beach County jury districts in our decision in Spencer v. State, 545 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1989). In Spencer, we considered the administrative order creating these identical jury districts, and we concluded:
[T]he administrative order creating the districts results in an unconstitutional systematic exclusion of a significant portion of the black population from the jury pool for the West Palm Beach district, from which the jury for this defendant's trial was drawn....
... The effect of the administrative order is that a black defendant charged with a crime in the predominantly white West Palm Beach district must be tried in that jury district, while a white defendant charged with a crime in the predominantly black western district has a choice of being tried in the predominantly white West Palm Beach district or in the predominantly black Glades district. That procedure of allowing a choice in one district but not in the other violates equal protection....
Id. at 1355. We note that the trial court in this case denied Craig's motion as untimely due to his having filed it three or four days prior to the commencement of trial. In fact, the trial judge noted that he normally granted such motions, when timely filed, as a matter of course and that the resolution of Spencer, which was then pending in this Court, might give Craig an issue for which he would later be entitled to relief. The trial judge was correct in his prognostication.
The state points out that Craig failed to make further objections concerning this issue, failed to note...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Owen v. Crosby
...is procedurally barred. 11. The Court had previously reversed two other cases on this issue at the time of Moreland. See Craig v. State, 583 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1991); Amos v. State, 545 So.2d 1352 12. Owen's trial in this case occurred in 1986 and the direct appeal opinion was issued by this C......
-
Richardson v. State, 86011
...116 S.Ct. 946, 133 L.Ed.2d 871 (1996). We address the remaining issues in turn. 15 Challenge to Venire Richardson cites Craig v. State, 583 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1991), for the proposition that the venire from which his jury was selected represents an unconstitutional jury districting system. His......
-
Nelms v. State
...portion of the black population from the eastern district jury pool. Spencer v. State, 545 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1989). See also Craig v. State, 583 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1991) (granting relief on direct appeal on the same issue); Amos v. State, 545 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1989) (granting relief on direct appe......
-
Moreland v. State
...case presents that "more compelling objective." Besides Spencer, we have, so far, reversed two other cases on this issue. Craig v. State, 583 So.2d 1018 (Fla.1991); Amos v. State, 545 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1989). Moreland made the claim, on which Spencer received relief, in the trial court and pu......