Crawford v. State, 2D02-2762.

Decision Date31 October 2003
Docket NumberNo. 2D02-2762.,2D02-2762.
Citation858 So.2d 1131
PartiesErrol CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Frank D.L. Winstead, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

FULMER, Judge.

Errol Crawford challenges his thirty-year sentence for aggravated battery. Because the trial court erred in utilizing the weapon enhancement in section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (1997), we reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence Crawford for a second-degree felony.

Section 775.087(1) precludes reclassification if the crime charged requires the use of a weapon as one of its essential elements. The jury was instructed that it could find Crawford guilty of aggravated battery either by finding great bodily harm or use of a deadly weapon. The jury verdict form did not make a distinction between the two types of aggravated battery. Based on the instructions given and the verdict rendered we cannot rule out the possibility that the jury found Crawford guilty of aggravated battery by use of a deadly weapon, in which case the weapon was an essential element of the offense, and enhancement was improper. See Lareau v. State, 573 So.2d 813 (Fla.1991); Bogdanon v. State, 763 So.2d 376 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.

CASANUEVA, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Peoples v. Sec'y, Dep't. of Corr.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 3 Agosto 2023
    ... ... U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and challenges the validity of ... his state conviction for manslaughter with a weapon, for ... which Mr. Peoples serves thirty years' ... testimony as (1) double hearsay, (2) violative of ... Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and (3) ... inadmissible under state evidentiary rules as ... ...
  • Syvrud v. Today Real Estate, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 31 Octubre 2003
    ... ... Nevertheless, at no point does this provision or any other part of the addendum specifically state that the Buyers waive the Sellers' duty to disclose hidden defects materially affecting the value ... ...
  • Harrell v. State, 2D12–2770.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Noviembre 2014
    ...or the use of a deadly weapon and the verdict form does not reflect which theory is the basis for the conviction. Crawford v. State, 858 So.2d 1131, 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; Montgomery v. State, 704 So.2d 548, 550–51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The possibility that the jury actually found the def......
  • Rodriguez v. State, 2D02-4416.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 Noviembre 2004
    ...775.087, Florida Statutes (1999), which allows reclassification of a crime when a weapon or firearm is used. See Crawford v. State, 858 So.2d 1131, 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Brown v. State, 806 So.2d 576, 577 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The State properly concedes that Rodriguez's sentence on the ag......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT